POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

AB 1825 expands mental health transition services and Medi-Cal eligibility for state hospital patients

Original title: Health care: state hospitals.

Record date · August 13, 2026

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill requires state hospitals to create comprehensive exit plans for patients, including Medi-Cal applications and referrals to county behavioral health services. It also expands eligibility for full-service mental health partnerships and targeted Medi-Cal services to individuals transitioning from state hospitals.

Why it matters

The bill changes the discharge process for state hospital patients by mandating coordinated care plans and increasing access to state-funded mental health and medical benefits, which impacts county administrative duties and service delivery.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State hospital patients

Patients are subject to new exit planning requirements and gain access to targeted Medi-Cal services and full-service partnership programs.

Directly affected

County behavioral health departments

Counties face new duties regarding Medi-Cal eligibility determinations and the provision of services for patients transitioning from state hospitals.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is affected by the new exit planning requirements?
Patients transitioning from state hospitals who are being evaluated for their risk of physical harm to others.
Does this bill change Medi-Cal eligibility?
Yes, it makes qualifying inmates of state hospitals eligible for targeted Medi-Cal services, similar to the existing eligibility for inmates of other public institutions.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Alignment of State Hospital and Prison Discharge Protocols

The bill explicitly aligns the discharge and transition planning requirements for state hospital patients with the existing protocols for prison and jail inmates.

Connected Entities

Proposition 63, State Department of State Hospitals, Board of Parole Hearings and 4 more
otherProposition 63“Mental Health Services Act enacted in 2004.”Map →
OrganizationState Department of State Hospitals“Responsible for treating prisoners with severe mental health disorders.”Map →
OrganizationBoard of Parole Hearings“Determines if prisoners meet criteria for state hospital treatment.”Map →
OrganizationCommission on State Mandates“Determines reimbursement for state-mandated local costs.”Map →
OrganizationState Department of Health Care Services“Administers the Behavioral Health Services Fund and Medi-Cal.”Map →
otherProposition 1“Behavioral Health Services Act approved in 2024.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Corrections and Rehabilitation“Certifies prisoner mental health status to the Board of Parole Hearings.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record