The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas HB 1697 regulates charter school management contracts and restricts related-party financial ties
Last action · March 12, 2025: Referred to Public EducationSponsor: Terry Canales
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Texas House Bill 1697 prohibits officials and employees from receiving direct or indirect payments from management companies, and requires management service records to be maintained separately and treated as public information. The legislation also bars individuals with financial or ownership ties to a management company from serving on a charter school's governing body and sets conflict-of-interest rules beginning with the 2025-2026 school year.
Changes financial transparency rules and governance eligibility for charter schools, affecting how management companies contract with public charter networks and prohibiting school leaders from holding financial interests or receiving payments from those contractors.
- Open-enrollment charter schools in Texas operate as public schools under a charter granted by the state but are managed by non-profit entities and sometimes contract out administrative and management services. context
- House Bill 1697 was introduced in the 89th Texas Legislature regular session by Representative Canales and referred to the Public Education committee. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Open-Enrollement Charter Schools
Must comply with new contracting rules, public records mandates for management services, and restrictions on related-party financial arrangements.
Charter School Governing Bodies and Officers
Subject to strict prohibitions against receiving payments from management companies, increased voter-qualification requirements, and expanded conflict-of-interest rules.
Management Companies
Required to maintain separate records for management services, subject their contract records to mandatory public disclosure, and adhere to restrictions on payments to school officials.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a charter school employee or board member receive payments from a management company?
Are records related to charter school management contracts public?
Who is eligible to serve on the governing body of a charter school or charter holder?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
3 actions- Mar 12, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to Public Education
- Mar 12, 2025HouseIntroducedRead first time
- Dec 20, 2024HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Stricter Public Disclosure for Charter Management
The bill moves charter management service records firmly into the scope of public information laws, removing exceptions that previously applied.
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools