POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah permits county recorders to record state documents bearing the Great Seal without notarization

Original title: Real Property Recording Amendments

Last action · March 17, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: Scott Chew and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Utah HB 211 allows county recorders to record real estate documents issued by the state or its political subdivisions without an or if the document has the Great Seal affixed by the lieutenant governor. The law takes effect on May 6, 2026.

Why it matters

Changes recording standards for government-issued property records by creating an exception to notarization requirements for state documents carrying the official seal.

Background
  • Scott H. Chew serves as a member of the Utah House of Representatives, representing District 53. context
  • Heidi Balderree serves as a member of the Utah State Senate. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

County recorders

County recorders are authorized to record specific state-issued documents without a certificate of acknowledgment or jurat when the Great Seal is affixed.

Directly affected

State and local agencies

State agencies and political subdivisions can have their documents recorded without traditional notary acknowledgments if the Great Seal is applied.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a county recorder accept a state-issued document without notarization?
Yes, if the document has the Great Seal affixed by the lieutenant governor.
When does this law go into effect?
The bill takes effect on May 6, 2026.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

37 actions
  1. Mar 17, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ to Governor
  3. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Feb 20, 2026House
    House/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Feb 20, 2026Clerk of the House
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Feb 13, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 31 earlier actions
  1. Feb 13, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from House for Enrolling
  2. Feb 12, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
  3. Feb 12, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  4. Feb 11, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  5. Feb 11, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
  6. Feb 11, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 3rd reading
  7. Feb 11, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  8. Feb 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  9. Feb 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ comm rpt/ placed on Consent Calendar
  10. Feb 5, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Consent Calendar Recommendation
  11. Feb 5, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  12. Feb 3, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  13. Jan 30, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  14. Jan 29, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  15. Jan 29, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  16. Jan 29, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  17. Jan 29, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  18. Jan 27, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  19. Jan 27, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ placed on Consent Calendar
  20. Jan 26, 2026House
    House Comm - Consent Calendar Recommendation
  21. Jan 26, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  22. Jan 23, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  23. Jan 21, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  24. Jan 21, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0211
  25. Jan 20, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  26. Jan 17, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0211
  27. Jan 14, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  28. Jan 9, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0211
  29. Jan 9, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0211
  30. Jan 9, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  31. Jan 9, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

State Tax Commission, Scott H. Chew, Heidi Balderree and 5 more
OrganizationState Tax Commission“Recipient of boundary action copies from county recorders”Map →
PersonScott H. Chew“Chief Sponsor of HB 211”Map →
PersonHeidi Balderree“Senate Sponsor of HB 211”Map →
locationUtah“Jurisdiction where the legislation applies”Map →
OrganizationPoint of the Mountain State Land Authority“Entity submitting plats for point of the mountain state land”Map →
OrganizationInternal Revenue Service“Issued tax-related documents exempt from certain formatting rules”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of the Treasury“Parent department of the Internal Revenue Service”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Health and Human Services“Agency that determines infectious disease transferability regarding stigmatized ”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy5
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record