POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on National Park Access and Management

Original title: OVERSIGHT HEARING ON EXAMINING BARRIERS TO ACCESS: ONGOING VISITOR. EXPERIENCE ISSUES AT AMERICA'S NATIONAL PARKS

Record date · January 1, 2024

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations held a hearing to examine ongoing challenges regarding visitor access and management at America's National Parks. The session focused on whether increased federal funding is effectively addressing operational issues or if administrative changes are required.

Why it matters

The hearing evaluates the effectiveness of current National Park Service management and funding strategies, which directly impacts how millions of visitors access public lands and how federal resources are allocated to park operations.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

National Park Service

The agency is subject to congressional oversight regarding its management practices and use of funding.

Directly affected

National Park Visitors

The policies and management decisions discussed impact the accessibility and quality of the visitor experience at national parks.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on July 27, 2023, in the Longworth House Office Building.
  • The Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations convened to discuss 'Examining Barriers to Access: Ongoing Visitor Experience Issues at America's National Parks'.
  • Michael T. Reynolds, Deputy Director of the National Park Service, provided testimony.
  • Chairman Paul Gosar questioned the effectiveness of increased federal and private sector funding in solving park management and access issues.
Show all 5 facts
  • The hearing record includes opening statements from the Chairman and the Ranking Minority Member, with other members' statements submitted for the record.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to investigate ongoing issues regarding visitor access and the overall visitor experience at National Parks across the United States.
Who testified at the hearing?
Michael T. Reynolds, the Deputy Director for Congressional and External Relations at the National Park Service, provided testimony.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Questioning Funding Efficacy

The Chairman explicitly challenged the long-standing assumption that increased funding is the primary solution to National Park Service operational challenges.

Connected Entities

Committee on Natural Resources, Melanie A. Stansbury, Paul Gosar and 2 more
OrganizationCommittee on Natural Resources“House committee overseeing the subcommittee”Map →
PersonMelanie A. Stansbury“Ranking Minority Member of the Subcommittee”Map →
PersonPaul Gosar“Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations”Map →
PersonMichael T. Reynolds“Deputy Director for Congressional and External Relations, National Park Service”Map →
OrganizationNational Park Service“Federal agency responsible for managing national parks”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record