POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on White Nationalist Terrorism

Original title: MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF WHITE NATIONALIST TERRORISM AT HOME AND ABROAD

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony and legislative inquiry into how federal agencies and international partners identify and respond to white nationalist extremist threats.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Federal Law Enforcement and Intelligence Agencies

These agencies are responsible for implementing policies and strategies discussed during the hearing regarding domestic and international terrorism.

General Public

The public is affected by the development of national security policies and counter-terrorism strategies discussed by the committees.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the official record of a 2019 joint congressional hearing held by the House Committees on Foreign Affairs and Homeland Security. The hearing focused on addressing the threat of white nationalist terrorism both within the United States and internationally.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on September 18, 2019, as a joint session between the Subcommittee on the Middle East, North Africa, and International Terrorism and the Subcommittee on Intelligence and Counterterrorism.
  • The hearing was designated as Serial No. 116-63 of the 116th Congress.
  • Expert testimony was provided by Dr. Cynthia Miller-Idriss, Mr. Christian Picciolini, and Dr. Sharon Nazarian.
  • The record includes supplemental materials submitted by Representative Sheila Jackson Lee regarding demographic trends and attacks on houses of worship.
  • A video titled 'No More Talk' was submitted for the record by witness Christian Picciolini.
  • The hearing record includes formal statements for the record from Representatives Gerald Connolly and Sheila Jackson Lee.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was convened to examine the challenge of white nationalist terrorism at home and abroad and to gather expert testimony on the subject.
Who testified at this hearing?
The witnesses were Dr. Cynthia Miller-Idriss (American University), Mr. Christian Picciolini (Free Radicals Project), and Dr. Sharon Nazarian (Anti-Defamation League).

Why It Matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony and legislative inquiry into how federal agencies and international partners identify and respond to white nationalist extremist threats.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Extensive Supplemental Documentation

The hearing record includes a significant amount of supplemental research and media submitted by Representative Jackson Lee, indicating a focus on the intersection of demographic shifts and violence against religious institutions.

Connected Entities

organizationHouse Committee on Homeland SecurityJoint committee hostMap →
personChristian PiccioliniWitness, Founder of the Free Radicals ProjectMap →
personMax RoseChairman of the Subcommittee on Intelligence and CounterterrorismMap →
personTheodore E. DeutchChairman of the Subcommittee on the Middle East, North Africa, and InternationalMap →
organizationHouse Committee on Foreign AffairsJoint committee hostMap →
personCynthia Miller-IdrissWitness, Director of the International Training and Education Program at AmericaMap →
personSharon NazarianWitness, Senior Vice President for International Affairs at the Anti-Defamation Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record