POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Select Committee on the Climate Crisis: Member Day Hearing

Original title: MEMBER DAY

January 1, 2020

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing served as a formal platform for non-committee members of Congress to influence the legislative agenda and policy recommendations of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Members of Congress

Members of Congress used this platform to formally submit their policy positions and legislative priorities for consideration by the committee.

Select Committee on the Climate Crisis

The committee members received testimony and statements to assist in shaping future climate-related legislation.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2020.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript record of a '' hearing held by the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis on November 14, 2019. During this session, various members of Congress who do not serve on the committee were invited to present their views and policy priorities regarding climate change.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on November 14, 2019, by the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis.
  • The session was designated as a 'Member Day,' allowing members of Congress not on the committee to submit testimony.
  • The committee received oral and prepared statements from 15 members of Congress during the hearing.
  • The committee received additional prepared statements for the record from 10 members of Congress who did not provide oral testimony.
  • The hearing is recorded as Serial No. 116-14 of the 116th Congress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a 'Member Day' hearing?
It is a hearing where members of Congress who are not part of a specific committee are invited to share their perspectives and legislative priorities with that committee.
What was the purpose of this specific hearing?
The purpose was to gather input from various members of the House of Representatives to inform the work of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis.

Why It Matters

This hearing served as a formal platform for non-committee members of Congress to influence the legislative agenda and policy recommendations of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

(C) MANAGEMENT INC.

on behalf of Association of Community Cancer Centers

2021

GOVERNMENT ISSUESHEALTH ISSUES

THE TELEHEALTH MODERNIZATION ACT (H.R. 1332/ S.368) Organized a Virtual Capitol Hill Day for ACCC members (70+) on May 12th, 2021. Created one-pagers and talking points on importance of this legislation. ACCC views telehealth expansion as critical for cancer patient access to healthcare providers. THE SAFE STEP ACT (H.R.2163/S.464) Organized a Virtual Capitol Hill Day for ACCC members (70+) on May 12th, 2021. Created one-pagers and talking points on importance of this legislation. ACCC views step therapy in the use of cancer care delivery to be a hinderance to best practice and timely treatment/access of care for patients. THE ACCESS TO GENETIC COUNSELOR SERVICES ACT (H.R. 2144/S.1450) Organized a Virtual Capitol Hill Day for ACCC members (70+) on May 12th, 2021. Created one-pagers and talking points on importance of this legislation. ACCC views genetic counselors as integral members of the cancer care delivery team in oncology programs/practices in the US. THE RESEARCH INVESTMENT TO SPARK THE ECONOMY (RISE) ACT (H.R. 869/S.289) Organized a Virtual Capitol Hill Day for ACCC members (70+) on May 12th, 2021. Created one-pagers and talking points on importance of this legislation. ACCC understands the importance of research funding for the NIH and oncology investigators to promote clinical trials that impact improving cancer outcomes. THE MEDICARE MULTI-CANCER EARLY DETECTION SCREENING COVERAGE ACT OF 2021 (H.R. 1946) Organized a Virtual Capitol Hill Day for ACCC members (70+) on May 12th, 2021. Created one-pagers and talking points on importance of this legislation. ACCC advocates for the use and coverage of cancer screening modalities that will diagnose cancer at earlier stages therefore improving patient outcomes. MOST FAVORED NATION (Proposed by Trump Administration at end of 2020) ACCC entered into a lawsuit against HHS in December 2020 opposing the Most Favored Nation proposal tying drug reimbursements to international reference pricing. By lowering reimbursement to cancer programs and practices, patient access to care would be limited as supportive cancer care services limited due to lack of reimbursement to cover positions. ACCC was concerned over programs/practices closing if proposal were to move forward. ACCC met with one Senators office on this topic expressing concern in January 2021. RADIATION ONCOLOGY MODEL (Proposed by CMMI) ACCC met with 1 Senate office and 1 House office over concerns re: this alternative payment model. ACCC has concerns over mandatory nature of Radiation Oncology model testing reimbursement rates and potentially limiting access to care for patients who are recommended radiation for their cancer diagnosis, particularly in rural areas of the U.S.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift80% confidence

Broad Congressional Engagement

The high number of participants (25 total members) indicates a wide range of congressional interest in the committee's climate mandate.

Connected Entities

organizationSelect Committee on the Climate CrisisHouse of Representatives committee overseeing climate policyMap →
personBetty McCollumMember of Congress who provided oral and prepared testimonyMap →
personKathy CastorChair of the Select Committee on the Climate CrisisMap →
personLauren UnderwoodMember of Congress who provided oral and prepared testimonyMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record