POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Hearing on the Restoration of America's Wire Act (H.R. 707)

Original title: RESTORATION OF AMERICA'S WIRE ACT

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing concerns a legislative proposal that would define the scope of federal prohibitions on online gambling, potentially impacting the legality of state-authorized internet gaming operations.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Online gambling operators

The bill proposes to clarify or restrict the scope of federal law governing internet-based wagering.

State governments

The legislation may impact the ability of states to authorize and regulate online gaming within their jurisdictions.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript record of a 2015 House Judiciary hearing regarding H.R. 707, a bill proposed to clarify federal law regarding online gambling. The hearing featured testimony from legal experts, academics, and advocacy groups regarding the scope of the and its application to internet-based wagering.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on March 25, 2015, by the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
  • The subject of the hearing was H.R. 707, titled the 'Restoration of America's Wire Act'.
  • The hearing included oral and written testimony from five expert witnesses.
  • The record includes supplemental materials and responses to questions for the record provided by the witnesses.
  • The hearing was conducted during the 114th Congress, First Session.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of H.R. 707?
The bill, titled the 'Restoration of America's ', was introduced to address the interpretation of federal law regarding online gambling.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included John Warren Kindt (University of Illinois), Les Bernal (Stop Predatory Gambling), Michael K. Fagan (Washington University School of Law), Andrew Moylan (R Street Institute), and Parry Aftab (WiredSafety, Inc.).

Why It Matters

The hearing concerns a legislative proposal that would define the scope of federal prohibitions on online gambling, potentially impacting the legality of state-authorized internet gaming operations.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Federal vs. State Gambling Authority

The hearing highlights a clear tension between federal legislative attempts to define gambling scope and the existing state-level regulatory frameworks.

Connected Entities

personJohn Warren KindtWitness, Professor Emeritus at University of IllinoisMap →
personLes BernalWitness, National Director of Stop Predatory GamblingMap →
personMichael K. FaganWitness, Adjunct Professor of LawMap →
personParry AftabWitness, Founder of WiredSafety, Inc.Map →
personAndrew MoylanWitness, Executive Director of R Street InstituteMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record