POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Maryland requires law enforcement agencies to respond to, record, and report on immigration enforcement actions

Original title: Public Safety - Law Enforcement - Response to Immigration Enforcement Actions

Last action · February 12, 2026: Hearing 2/25 at 1:00 p.m.Sponsor: Sara Love

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Maryland law enforcement agencies must dispatch an officer to observe, record with a body-worn camera, and report on immigration enforcement activities occurring within their jurisdiction, effective October 1, 2026. The responding officer must document details such as warrants, federal agencies involved, force used, medical attention needed, and any observed violations of law. Resulting reports and video footage are subject to public information laws and must be stored for at least 4 years and 4 months, respectively.

Why it matters

Local police departments and sheriff's offices face mandatory deployment and documentation duties whenever federal immigration actions take place locally, creating new public records and mandated storage periods.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Law enforcement agencies

Law enforcement agencies are required to dispatch officers to immigration enforcement actions, file detailed reports, preserve evidence, and store records for mandated retention periods.

Directly affected

Law enforcement officers

Officers must respond to notices of immigration enforcement, record actions using body-worn cameras, document specific details in reports, and preserve evidence while maintaining constitutional duties.

Key Facts

  • Law enforcement agencies must dispatch at least one officer upon receiving notice of an immigration enforcement action within their jurisdiction.
  • Responding officers must observe the action, ensure the safe transfer of individuals in custody, record the action with body-worn cameras, file a comprehensive report, and preserve related evidence.
  • Required report details include date, time, location, warrant type, federal agencies involved, force used, medical attention required, observation restrictions, and observed violations of law.
  • Body-worn camera footage of immigration enforcement actions must be stored for at least 4 months.
Show all 8 facts
  • Reports filed regarding immigration enforcement actions must be stored for at least 4 years.
  • Recorded footage and documentation are subject to the provisions of the Public Information Act.
  • Officers responding to immigration enforcement actions must continue to perform the constitutional obligations of their position.
  • The Act takes effect on October 1, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must a law enforcement officer do when responding to an immigration enforcement action?
The officer must observe the action, ensure safe transfer of individuals in custody, record it with a body-worn camera to the extent practicable, file a detailed report, and preserve related evidence.
How long must the reports and camera footage be stored?
Body-worn camera footage must be stored for at least 4 months, and the written report must be stored for at least 4 years.
Are these reports and recordings available to the public?
Yes, the documentation and footage recorded are subject to the .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 12, 2026Senate
    Hearing 2/25 at 1:00 p.m.
  2. Feb 6, 2026SenateIntroduced
    First Reading Judicial Proceedings

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Military Department, Sara Love, Maryland National Guard and 2 more
OrganizationMilitary Department“Controls Maryland National Guard members assigned to Martin State Airport”Map →
PersonSara Love“Senator sponsoring Senate Bill 660”Map →
OrganizationMaryland National Guard“Excluded from the definition of a law enforcement agency under certain condition”Map →
locationMartin State Airport“Military property designated for National Guard police powers”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly of Maryland“Enacting body of the legislation”Map →

Sources

Open source document

mgaleg.maryland.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record