POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: Inland Entertainment Corporation

Original title: NOSSAMAN GUTHNER KNOX & ELLIOTT LLP lobbying for INLAND ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This report documents $1,518 in payments made to a firm, though no specific legislative or were lobbied during this period.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Inland Entertainment Corporation

The corporation is the entity responsible for reporting its lobbying expenditures.

Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP

The firm is the service provider receiving payment for lobbying activities.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document discloses activity and payments made by Inland Entertainment Corporation to the law firm Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP for the first quarter of 2000.

Key Facts

  • The reporting period for this disclosure is January 1, 2000, through March 31, 2000.
  • Inland Entertainment Corporation paid $1,518 to Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP for lobbying services during this period.
  • The firm reported no active lobbying of legislative or state agency administrative actions during this timeframe.

Why It Matters

This report documents $1,518 in payments made to a firm, though no specific legislative or were lobbied during this period.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did the lobbying firm influence any laws during this period?
No, the report explicitly states that no legislative or state agency were lobbied during this period.
How much was paid for these lobbying services?
The total payment reported for the period was $1,518.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Inactive Lobbying Period

Despite retaining a lobbying firm, the client reported zero active lobbying efforts for the entire quarter.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance10
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy0
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment0
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz0
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record