POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Violence Against Minority Institutions

Original title: THE RISE IN VIOLENCE AGAINST MINORITY INSTITUTIONS

January 1, 2022

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing serves as a formal record of congressional inquiry into domestic security threats, which may inform future federal legislation regarding hate crime reporting, campus security funding, and law enforcement resources for vulnerable institutions.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)

These institutions are the subject of the inquiry due to reported increases in security threats.

Religious Institutions

These organizations are identified as targets of violence and intimidation in the hearing scope.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2022.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is the official record of a February 17, 2022, House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing regarding the rise in threats and violence directed at minority-serving institutions, including Historically Black Colleges and Universities (s) and religious centers. The hearing featured testimony from security experts, university leaders, and community advocates to discuss the scope of these threats and potential policy responses.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on February 17, 2022, by the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
  • The session focused on the rise of violence and threats against minority institutions, specifically citing HBCUs and religious organizations.
  • Seven expert witnesses provided oral and written testimony regarding security threats.
  • Multiple external documents were entered into the record, including statements from the United Negro College Fund, the Thurgood Marshall College Fund, and the Anti-Defamation League.
  • The hearing record includes an article regarding threats to HBCUs and a letter from the American Council on Education.
  • The proceedings were conducted during the Second Session of the 117th Congress.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was convened to examine the increase in violent threats and acts of intimidation targeting minority-serving institutions and religious communities.
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included security experts, university presidents, religious leaders, and representatives from civil rights organizations.

Why It Matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of congressional inquiry into domestic security threats, which may inform future federal legislation regarding hate crime reporting, campus security funding, and law enforcement resources for vulnerable institutions.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 3 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift80% confidence

Focus on Institutional Security

The hearing highlights a shift toward federal oversight of security protocols at private and public minority-serving institutions.

Connected Entities

personSeth G. JonesWitness, Senior VP at Center for Strategic and International StudiesMap →
personCharlie Cytron-WalkerWitness, Rabbi from Colleyville, TexasMap →
personMargaret HuangWitness, President and CEO of Southern Poverty Law CenterMap →
personJerrold NadlerChair of the Committee on the JudiciaryMap →
personDavid K. WilsonWitness, President of Morgan State UniversityMap →
personBurgess OwensMember of the SubcommitteeMap →
personSheila Jackson LeeChair of the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland SecurityMap →
personAndy BiggsRanking Member of the SubcommitteeMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record