The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Senate Hearing on the Future of Warfare
Record date · January 1, 2016
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The Senate Committee on Armed Services held a hearing on November 3, 2015, to discuss how the U.S. military must adapt to emerging technologies and evolving global threats. Experts and senators examined the need for defense reform to counter adversaries who are rapidly developing cyber, robotic, and anti-access capabilities.
This hearing sets the policy agenda for how the U.S. military prioritizes research, development, and acquisition spending to maintain a technological edge against global adversaries.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
U.S. Military
The military faces potential changes in procurement strategies, technological focus, and organizational structure based on the committee's findings.
Defense Contractors
Traditional defense contractors may face increased competition from commercial technology firms for government research and development contracts.
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on November 3, 2015, in the Dirksen Senate Office Building.
- The committee is evaluating how to shift defense acquisition from traditional contractors to include more commercial technology companies.
- Chairman McCain stated that the top four U.S. defense contractors combined spend only 27 percent of what Google spends annually on research and development.
- The committee identified cyber, space, robotics, unmanned systems, miniaturization, directed energy, hypersonics, and data analytics as critical future warfare areas.
Show all 6 facts
- The hearing addressed the impact of the Budget Control Act and sequestration on military readiness and technological development.
- Adversaries are increasingly using asymmetric strategies, including hybrid warfare and anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities, to counter U.S. military advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this hearing?
Why is the committee concerned about commercial companies like Google?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Pivot to Commercial Tech
The committee explicitly identified a need to move away from traditional defense-only contractors toward commercial technology firms to maintain a technological edge.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment15Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools