POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Ohio HB 441 extends the civil lawsuit filing deadline for libel or slander from one year to four years

Original title: Regards the one-year limitations period for libel or slander

Last action · June 10, 2026: Referred to JudiciarySponsors: Brian Stewart and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Ohio House Bill 441 extends the time limit for filing a civil lawsuit for or from one year to four years. Under the measure, the filing window begins immediately on the date the material is published or the words are spoken, regardless of when the injured party discovers them.

Why it matters

The measure quadruples the duration plaintiffs have to initiate defamation litigation in Ohio courts while simultaneously starting the countdown clock on the exact date of publication or speech instead of the date of discovery.

Background
  • Under prior Ohio law, civil actions for libel or slander were required to be commenced within one year after the cause of action accrued. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Plaintiffs filing libel or slander claims

Plaintiffs receive a longer four-year window to file suit, but the limitations period starts on the date of publication or speech regardless of when they discover the statement.

Directly affected

Defendants in libel or slander lawsuits

Defendants face a potential four-year exposure window for defamation claims instead of one year, though each publication creates a distinct limitations period.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When does the four-year clock start ticking for a libel claim?
The cause of action from the date of publication of the alleged ous matter, regardless of when you discover it.
Does discovering a defamatory statement later extend the filing deadline?
No. The bill explicitly states that the four-year period applies regardless of when the aggrieved person knew of, discovered, or reasonably should have known of the ous matter or ous words.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Jun 10, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Judiciary
  2. Jun 4, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced
  3. Jun 3, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported - Amended (Judiciary)
  4. Jun 3, 2026HouseFloor
    Passed
  5. Sep 15, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Judiciary
  6. Sep 9, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history & redline

3 versions on file
Comparing As Reported by the House Judiciary Committee → As Passed by the House
removed addedOfficial text
removed: hb441_01_RH added: hb441_02_PH As removed: Reported added: Passed by the House removed: Judiciary Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session Am. H. B. No. 441 2025-2026 Representatives Stewart, Mathews, A. removed: Cosponsor: Representative Williams added: Cosponsors: Representatives Williams, Bird, Brennan, Gross, Hall, T., Odioso, Peterson, Rogers, Sigrist, Thomas, C., White, A., Willis, Young To amend section 2305.11 of the Revised Code to increase the limitations period from one year to four years for libel or slander and […]
Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Voting Record

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Elimination of Discovery Rule for Defamation

While extending the overall limitations period to four years, the text explicitly ties the start of the clock to the date of publication or spoken words, overriding discovery-based delays.

Connected Entities

Thomas, C., Bird, Hall, T. and 13 more
PersonThomas, C.“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →
PersonBird“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →
PersonHall, T.“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →
PersonWhite, A.“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →
PersonRogers“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →
PersonWillis“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →
PersonBrennan“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →
PersonBrian Stewart“Primary sponsor of HB 441 (Republican, District 12)”Map →
PersonPeterson“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →
PersonAdam Mathews“Primary sponsor of HB 441 (Republican, District 56)”Map →
PersonJosh Williams“Cosponsor of HB 441 (Republican, District 44)”Map →
OrganizationOhio General Assembly“Legislative body enacting the statute”Map →
PersonSigrist“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →
PersonYoung“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →
PersonOdioso“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →
PersonGross“Cosponsor of HB 441”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record