POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Congressional Hearing on Voting Technology Security

Original title: ELECTION SECURITY: VOTING TECHNOLOGY VULNERABILITIES

Record date · January 1, 2020

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is the official record of a June 25, 2019, joint congressional hearing held by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. The hearing examined vulnerabilities in voting technology and discussed strategies to improve election security.

Why it matters

The hearing serves as a formal record of expert testimony and legislative oversight regarding the security of voting systems used in U.S. elections, which directly impacts the integrity and administration of federal, state, and local voting processes.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Election officials

These officials are responsible for implementing and securing the voting technologies discussed in the hearing.

Directly affected

Voters

Voters rely on the security and integrity of the voting systems discussed to cast their ballots.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on June 25, 2019, by the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight and the Subcommittee on Research and Technology.
  • The hearing focused on identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in voting technology.
  • Expert testimony was provided by representatives from NIST, local election administration, academia, and the private sector.
  • The record includes written statements from committee members and witnesses.
Show all 6 facts
  • The document contains an appendix with responses to post-hearing questions from witnesses.
  • Additional materials for the record were submitted by Representative Mikie Sherrill and Representative Sean Casten.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was conducted to investigate and discuss vulnerabilities in voting technology and to explore ways to enhance election security.
Who testified at this hearing?
Witnesses included experts from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), local election officials, academic researchers, and private sector s.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Technical Oversight

The hearing demonstrates a shift toward using scientific and technical expertise (NIST, cryptographers) to address election administration challenges.

Connected Entities

Dr. Josh Benaloh, House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Dr. Charles H. Romine and 3 more
PersonDr. Josh Benaloh“Senior Cryptographer, Microsoft Research.”Map →
OrganizationHouse Committee on Science, Space, and Technology“The committee hosting the joint hearing.”Map →
PersonDr. Charles H. Romine“Director, Information Technology Laboratory, NIST.”Map →
PersonPaul Ziriax“Secretary, Oklahoma State Election Board.”Map →
PersonDr. Latanya Sweeney“Professor at Harvard University.”Map →
PersonNeal Kelley“Registrar of Voters, Orange County, California.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record