Congressional Hearing on Planned Parenthood Procedures and Ethics
January 1, 2015
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This served as a formal congressional inquiry into the operations of the nation's largest abortion provider, influencing federal oversight and public discourse on reproductive health policy.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Planned Parenthood
The organization is the subject of a congressional inquiry regarding its medical procedures and ethical standards.
House Judiciary Committee members
Committee members are responsible for conducting oversight and gathering testimony for the congressional record.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The House Judiciary Committee convened a hearing on October 8, 2015, titled 'Planned Parenthood Exposed: Examining Abortion Procedures and Medical Ethics'.
- The hearing was presided over by Chairman Bob Goodlatte.
- Witnesses included Dr. Anthony Levatino, Susan Thayer, Caroline Fredrickson, and Luana Stoltenberg.
- The hearing record includes submitted letters and statements from Americans United for Life and the Alliance Defending Freedom.
- The hearing was held in the Rayburn House Office Building, room 2141.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This served as a formal congressional inquiry into the operations of the nation's largest abortion provider, influencing federal oversight and public discourse on reproductive health policy.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
External Support Documentation
The hearing record explicitly references external support documents from advocacy groups like Americans United for Life and the Alliance Defending Freedom.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy95Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools