POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofNavy
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Navy Surface Force Strategy and Technology

Original title: [H.A.S.C. No. 114-37] THE ROLE OF SURFACE FORCES IN PRESENCE, DETERRENCE, AND WARFIGHTING

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing outlines the strategic and technological direction for U.S. naval , which influences future defense spending priorities and the operational capabilities of the fleet.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Navy

The Navy is the agency responsible for implementing the strategic concepts and technology integrations discussed.

Defense Contractors

Companies involved in developing radar, missile, and rail gun technologies are impacted by the subcommittee's focus on these capabilities.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces held a hearing on April 15, 2015, to discuss the future of U.S. Navy surface forces. The discussion focused on transitioning to a more offensive posture through new technologies and a strategic concept known as '.'

Key Facts

  • The subcommittee discussed the transition of Navy surface forces from a defensive to an offensive posture.
  • The Navy is integrating new air and missile defense radar systems described as 30 times more effective than current technology.
  • New digital electronic warfare capabilities are being deployed to detect and defeat incoming missiles.
  • Antisubmarine warfare capabilities are being expanded via multi-function towed arrays and variable depth sonar on small surface combatants.
  • The Navy is fielding new long-range antiship missiles and enhanced Sea Sparrow missiles.
  • The Navy is exploring the use of electromagnetic rail guns, which could cost less than $50,000 per salvo.
  • The Navy is testing laser weapons systems to increase multi-functionality of platforms.
  • The 'distributed lethality' concept involves disaggregating surface combatants from centralized carrier battle groups to complicate adversary targeting.

Why It Matters

This hearing outlines the strategic and technological direction for U.S. naval , which influences future defense spending priorities and the operational capabilities of the fleet.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is 'distributed lethality'?
It is a naval strategy concept that involves spreading out rather than keeping them in a centralized carrier battle group to make it harder for adversaries to target them.
What new weapons technologies were discussed?
The hearing highlighted the development of electromagnetic rail guns, laser weapons systems, and new long-range antiship missiles.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Shift to Distributed Lethality

The hearing marks a formal congressional discussion on moving away from centralized carrier battle groups toward a more distributed force structure.

Connected Entities

personBryan ClarkSenior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary AssessmentsMap →
personJ. Randy ForbesChairman of the Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection ForcesMap →
personSteve RussellNew member of the subcommitteeMap →
personBryan McGrathManaging Director at The FerryBridge GroupMap →
organizationSubcommittee on Seapower and Projection ForcesHouse Armed Services subcommittee conducting the hearingMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record