POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Idaho House Bill 499 authorizes drone interception near prisons and sets criminal penalties

Original title: UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS – Adds to existing law to establish provisions regarding unmanned aircraft systems near Department of Correction facilities.

Last action · January 21, 2026: Reported Printed and Referred to Judiciary, Rules & Administration

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Idaho House Bill 499 authorizes the Department of Correction and law enforcement to use electronic interference and physical capture against drones operating within two miles of prison facilities in a nefarious manner. The measure makes unauthorized drone use near correctional facilities a crime punishable by fines between $2,000 and $5,000, up to one year in prison, and mandatory equipment , taking effect July 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Drone operators flying near Idaho correctional facilities face mandatory equipment seizure and criminal penalties starting July 1, 2026, while state agencies gain explicit legal immunity for damaging unauthorized aircraft through defensive interference.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

unmanned aircraft system operators

Drone operators face criminal penalties, fines, and equipment forfeiture for flying within two nautical miles of correctional facilities.

Directly affected

Department of Correction

The department is authorized to deploy mitigation measures against drones, gains immunity from property damage liability, and must post warning notices.

Directly affected

law enforcement officers and agencies

Law enforcement personnel are granted explicit authority to intercept and disable drones operating near correctional facilities.

Key Facts

  • Defines 'mitigation measures' as actions including jamming to cause electronic interference and neutralize, intercept, disable, or disrupt an unmanned aircraft system.
  • Defines 'nefarious manner' as using a drone for illegal, dangerous, or harmful purposes such as spying, smuggling contraband, or facilitating criminal activity.
  • Establishes 'proximity' as within two nautical miles from the farthest defined perimeter of a correctional facility.
  • Authorizes the Department of Correction, law enforcement officers, or agencies to take reasonable and necessary mitigation measures against drones operating near restricted airspace in a nefarious manner upon reasonable suspicion.
Show all 9 facts
  • Grants immunity from liability to the Department of Correction and law enforcement for any loss of or damage to an unmanned aircraft system resulting from mitigation measures.
  • Requires the Department of Correction to post notices on roads near correctional facilities designating the area as a 'Drone No Fly Zone.'
  • Makes operating an unmanned aircraft system within the proximity of a correctional facility's restricted airspace unlawful.
  • Establishes criminal penalties for unlawful drone use near prisons of a fine between $2,000 and $5,000, imprisonment for not more than one year, and mandatory forfeiture of the unmanned aircraft system.
  • Places the responsibility on drone operators to be familiar with airspace restrictions and prison locations, explicitly barring lack of knowledge as a defense.

Frequently Asked Questions

What can law enforcement and corrections officers do to drones near prisons?
They may use detection, tracking, identification, and mitigation methods such as jamming, hacking, or physical capture if there is reasonable suspicion the drone is operating in a nefarious manner within two nautical miles of a facility.
What are the penalties for flying a drone near an Idaho correctional facility?
Violators face a fine of not less than $2,000 and not more than $5,000, imprisonment for up to one year, and mandatory of the drone.
Can a drone operator claim they did not know the prison was nearby?
No. Lack of knowledge that the prohibited act occurred within the proximity of is not a defense.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 21, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed and Referred to Judiciary, Rules & Administration
  2. Jan 20, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

Department of Correction
OrganizationDepartment of Correction“Authorized to take mitigation measures against drones and post warning notices n”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record