POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Ohio House authorizes online raffles and establishes regulatory framework for charitable gaming

Original title: Authorize online raffles under the Charitable Gaming Law

Last action · February 11, 2026: Referred to Select Committee on GamingSponsors: Meredith Craig and 38 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Ohio House Bill 476 legalizes online raffles for qualified charitable and tax-exempt organizations, establishing a comprehensive licensing, registration, and platform-approval framework under the state's Charitable Gaming Law. The measure requires platforms to be tested and approved by the attorney general, mandates age and residency verification (participants must be at least 18 and state residents), prohibits cash or cash-equivalent prizes for online raffles, and declares an emergency for immediate implementation.

Why it matters

Charitable organizations and veteran or fraternal groups gain a new digital fundraising mechanism, while platforms, distributors, and manufacturers face strict registration, bonding, and criminal background check requirements managed by the Ohio Attorney General.

Background
  • House Bill 476 was introduced in the 136th General Assembly of Ohio to update charitable gaming statutes to accommodate modern digital fundraising technologies. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Charitable organizations

Must comply with new registration, licensing, and net-profit distribution mandates when conducting online raffles.

Directly affected

Distributors and manufacturers

Required to secure annual licenses, post $50,000 bonds, and submit equipment for independent testing and attorney general approval.

Directly affected

Ohio raffle participants

Must verify age (at least 18) and state residency before participating and receiving prizes, which are restricted to tangible property.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible to conduct an online raffle under HB 476?
Entities exempt from federal income taxation under subsection 501(a) and described in 501(c)(3), 501(c)(4), 501(c)(6), 501(c)(7), 501(c)(8), 501(c)(10), or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code, along with school districts and chartered nonpublic schools, may conduct online raffles.
Can online raffle winners receive cash prizes?
No. Entities conducting online raffles are expressly prohibited from awarding cash, cash equivalents, or prepaid gift cards as prizes.
What requirements must online raffle platforms meet?
Platforms must be tested and certified by an independent testing laboratory, approved by the attorney general, require participants to verify they are at least 18 and Ohio residents, and avoid entertainment themes resembling slot machines.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Feb 11, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Select Committee on Gaming
  2. Nov 25, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Introduced
  3. Nov 19, 2025HouseFloor
    Passed
  4. Nov 18, 2025HouseCommittee
    Reported - Substitute (Finance)
  5. Oct 1, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Finance
  6. Sep 29, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history & redline

3 versions on file
Comparing As Reported by the House Finance Committee → As Passed by the House
removed addedOfficial text
removed: hb476_01_RH added: hb476_02_PH As removed: Reported added: Passed by the House removed: Finance Committee 136th General Assembly Regular Session Sub. H. B. No. 476 2025-2026 Representatives Craig, Thomas, D. Cosponsors: Representatives Ray, Glassburn, Brennan, Hall, T., Gross, Hiner, Ferguson, Kishman, Robb Blasdel, Stewart, removed: Ritter added: Ritter, Abrams, Bird, Brownlee, Claggett, Creech, Deeter, Dovilla, Fischer, Fowler Arthur, Hall, D., Hoops, John, Johnson, Lorenz, Manning, Mathews, A., Mathews, T., Miller, J., Mohamed, Moore, Mullins, Roemer, Sigrist, Synenberg, Williams, Young To amend sections 109.32, 2915.01, 2915.07, 2915.08, 2915.081, 2915.082, 2915.092, 2915.093, 2915.10, 2915.101, and 2915.14; to amend, for the purpose of adopting a new […]
Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Voting Record

Motion succeededHouse11/19/2025Ohio LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Passed

Total

91

Yes
91
No
0
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0

How they voted (88)

64 more members
Thomas HallParty not recordedyes
James M. HoopsParty not recordedyes
Mark HinerParty not recordedyes
Heidi WorkmanParty not recordedyes
Jennifer GrossParty not recordedyes
Crystal LettParty not recordedno
Bride Rose SweeneyParty not recordedno
Thaddeus J. ClaggettParty not recordedyes
Derrick HallParty not recordedno
Mark SigristParty not recordedno
Scott OelslagerParty not recordedyes
Eric SynenbergParty not recordedno
Karen BrownleeParty not recordedno
Sharon A. RayParty not recordedyes
Michael D. DovillaParty not recordedyes
Cindy AbramsParty not recordedyes
Terrence UpchurchParty not recordedno
Angela N. KingParty not recordedyes
Tex FischerParty not recordedyes
Phil PlummerParty not recordedyes
Kellie DeeterParty not recordedyes
Roy KlopfensteinParty not recordedyes
Meredith CraigParty not recordedyes
Daniel P. TroyParty not recordedno
Tracy RichardsonParty not recordedyes
Johnathan NewmanParty not recordedyes
Adam MathewsParty not recordedyes
Chris GlassburnParty not recordedno
Matthew KishmanParty not recordedyes
Ty MathewsParty not recordedyes
Phillip M. Robinson, Jr.Party not recordedno
Kevin RitterParty not recordedyes
Ty MooreParty not recordedyes
Cecil ThomasParty not recordedno
Gary ClickParty not recordedyes
Josh WilliamsParty not recordedyes
Michelle TeskaParty not recordedyes
Ismail MohamedParty not recordedno
Monica Robb BlasdelParty not recordedyes
Lauren McNallyParty not recordedno
Joseph A. Miller, IIIParty not recordedno
Mark JohnsonParty not recordedyes
Tom YoungParty not recordedyes
Rachel BakerParty not recordedno
Matt HuffmanParty not recordedyes
Adam BirdParty not recordedyes
Munira AbdullahiParty not recordedno
Jamie CallenderParty not recordedyes
Brian LamptonParty not recordedyes
Jean SchmidtParty not recordedyes
Jodi SalvoParty not recordedyes
Veronica SimsParty not recordedno
Erika WhiteParty not recordedno
Adam HolmesParty not recordedyes
Nick SantucciParty not recordedyes
Rodney CreechParty not recordedyes
Riordan McClainParty not recordedyes
Desireè TimsParty not recordedno
Marilyn JohnParty not recordedyes
Brian StewartParty not recordedyes
Juanita BrentParty not recordedno
Darnell BrewerParty not recordedno
Sean BrennanParty not recordedno
Justin PizzulliParty not recordedyes
Show 1 earlier roll call

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 34 more sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Digitization of Charitable Gaming

The legislation formally integrates internet-based platforms into Ohio's traditional Charitable Gaming Law, moving beyond physical ticket sales.

Connected Entities

David Thomas, Meredith Craig, Internal Revenue Service
PersonDavid Thomas“Republican Representative for District 65”Map →
PersonMeredith Craig“Republican Representative for District 77”Map →
OrganizationInternal Revenue Service“Federal tax-exempt status determinations”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record