The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Resolution to End U.S. Military Hostilities Against Iran
Last action · May 14, 2026: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.Sponsors: Josh Gottheimer and 11 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
This resolution directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from against the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days of February 28, 2026, unless Congress provides specific authorization for war. It asserts that Congress has not yet authorized these military actions and seeks to reassert its constitutional authority over the use of force.
This resolution would legally mandate the withdrawal of U.S. troops from combat operations against Iran by March 30, 2026, unless Congress passes a new declaration of war or specific authorization for the use of military force.
- The War Powers Resolution of 1973 was enacted to limit the President's ability to commit U.S. forces to an armed conflict without congressional approval. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
United States Armed Forces
The resolution mandates the removal of these forces from specific combat roles against Iran.
President of the United States
The resolution directs the President to withdraw forces from hostilities within a 30-day timeframe.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this mean all U.S. troops must leave the Middle East?
Can the U.S. still respond if attacked?
Does this stop intelligence gathering?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Failed in the House.
Procedural history
12 actions- May 14, 2026HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- May 14, 2026HouseOn agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 212 (Roll no. 170).
- May 14, 2026HouseFloorFailed of passage/not agreed to in House On agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 212 (Roll no. 170).
- May 14, 2026HouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3506-3507)
- May 13, 2026HousePOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Con. Res. 75, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution, and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Meeks demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- May 13, 2026HouseThe previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
Show 6 earlier actions
- May 13, 2026HouseDEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 75.
- May 13, 2026HouseConsidered previous order of the House. (consideration: CR H3439-3446; text: CR H3439)
- May 13, 2026HouseConsideration initiated previous order of the House.
- Apr 27, 2026HouseMr. Self asked unanimous consent That, it be in order at any time to consider H. Con. Res. 75 in the House if called up by the chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs or his designee; that the concurrent resolution be considered as read; and that the previous question be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution without intervening motion except for one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by Representative Mast of Florida and Representative Meeks of New York, or their respective designees. Agreed to without objection.
- Mar 4, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Mar 4, 2026HouseSubmitted in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
417
- Yes
- 208
- No
- 209
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (417)
393 more members
Show 1 earlier roll call
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Total
430
- Yes
- 212
- No
- 212
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 6
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (2)
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 7 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Invocation of War Powers
The resolution explicitly uses Section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to force a withdrawal, a rare and significant legislative action.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance95How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy85Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment40Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz75Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
