FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Wage Theft and Wage Recovery

Original title: STANDING UP FOR WORKERS: PREVENTING WAGE THEFT AND RECOVERING STOLEN WAGES

January 1, 2023

wage theft labor law workforce protections employment wages

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing serves as a formal record of legislative inquiry into labor practices, which may inform future federal policy regarding employer compliance and worker compensation recovery.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Workers

Workers are the primary subjects of wage theft discussions and potential policy changes regarding wage recovery.

Employers

Employers are subject to labor regulations and potential enforcement actions regarding wage payments.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2023.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Workforce Protections held a hearing on May 11, 2022, to examine the issue of and methods for recovering unpaid wages for workers. The session included testimony from labor officials, union representatives, legal experts, and business owners.

Key Facts

The hearing took place on May 11, 2022, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
The session was titled 'Standing Up for Workers: Preventing Wage Theft and Recovering Stolen Wages'.
The subcommittee received testimony from four witnesses representing government, labor, economic consulting, and small business sectors.
The record includes additional submissions from various organizations, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Retail Federation, and the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this hearing?

The hearing was held to discuss the prevalence of and to explore strategies for ensuring workers receive the wages they are legally owed.

Who testified at the hearing?

Witnesses included Karen Cacace (NY Attorney General's Office), Francisco Esparza (United Brotherhood of Carpenters), Tammy McCutchen (Resolution Economics), and Daniel Swenson-Klatt (Butter Bakery Cafe).

Why It Matters

This hearing serves as a formal record of legislative inquiry into labor practices, which may inform future federal policy regarding employer compliance and worker compensation recovery.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Broad Stakeholder Engagement

The hearing record includes submissions from a wide range of business advocacy groups, indicating significant industry interest in the subcommittee's focus on wage enforcement.

U.S. Chamber of Commerce NFIB National Retail Federation

Connected Entities

personFred Keller“Ranking Member of the Subcommittee.”Map →

personDaniel Swenson-Klatt“Owner & Operator, Butter Bakery Cafe.”Map →

organizationSubcommittee on Workforce Protections“The congressional body conducting the hearing.”Map →

personKaren Cacace“Labor Bureau Chief, New York State Office of the Attorney General.”Map →

personAlma S. Adams“Chairwoman of the Subcommittee.”Map →

personTammy McCutchen“Senior Affiliate, Resolution Economics.”Map →

personFrancisco Esparza“Representative, United Brotherhood of Carpenters.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100

Significance40
How much this matters to a regular citizen
Controversy30
Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
Entertainment5
Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
Buzz10
Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools