POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on National Cybersecurity Strategy

Original title: THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DEFENDING THE NATION FROM CYBER ATTACK

January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing highlights the current lack of a unified federal strategy for cyber defense, which impacts how the government protects critical infrastructure, private business data, and democratic processes from foreign and domestic cyber threats.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Department of Defense

The agency is responsible for a critical role in cyber defense and is subject to congressional oversight regarding its strategy.

Department of Homeland Security

The agency is responsible for protecting critical infrastructure and is subject to congressional oversight regarding its cyber mission.

Federal Bureau of Investigation

The agency is responsible for investigating cyber threats and is subject to congressional oversight regarding its cyber division operations.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2019.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Armed Services Committee held a hearing to examine how the U.S. government organizes its defense against cyber attacks. Senators and officials discussed the challenges of coordinating cyber defense across the Department of Defense, the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on October 19, 2017, in Washington, D.C.
  • The committee examined the roles of the Department of Defense, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security in cyber defense.
  • Chairman McCain stated that the U.S. currently lacks sufficient policies and strategies to counter cyber threats.
  • White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Rob Joyce declined the committee's invitation to testify, citing executive privilege and precedent regarding non-confirmed NSC staff.
  • The committee identified a misalignment between authority and accountability in the current federal cyber structure.
  • The hearing addressed threats to government systems, critical infrastructure, and democratic processes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was there an empty chair at the witness table?
The White House Cybersecurity Coordinator, Rob Joyce, declined to testify, citing and the precedent that non-confirmed National Security Council staff do not testify before Congress.
What is the main goal of this hearing?
To review the U.S. government's policy, strategy, and organization for protecting the nation from cyber attacks.

Why It Matters

This hearing highlights the current lack of a unified federal strategy for cyber defense, which impacts how the government protects critical infrastructure, private business data, and democratic processes from foreign and domestic cyber threats.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Accountability Gap

The committee explicitly identified a structural failure in the federal government where no single official is held accountable for the entirety of the national cyber mission.

Connected Entities

personChristopher C. KrebsPerforming the Duties of the Under Secretary for the National Protection and ProMap →
personRob JoyceWhite House Cybersecurity Coordinator who declined to testifyMap →
personJohn McCainChairman of the Senate Armed Services CommitteeMap →
organizationSenate Committee on Armed ServicesThe committee conducting the hearingMap →
personScott SmithAssistant Director for the Cyber Division, FBIMap →
personKenneth P. RapuanoAssistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and Global SecurityMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment40
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record