POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Senate Hearing on Agricultural Research for the 2018 Farm Bill

Original title: AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH: PERSPECTIVES ON PAST AND FUTURE SUCCESSES FOR THE 2018 FARM BILL

Record date · January 1, 2019

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document is a transcript of a 2017 Senate Committee on Agriculture hearing regarding the role of research in the upcoming 2018 . Experts from the USDA, academia, and the private sector provided testimony on past successes and future priorities for agricultural innovation.

Why it matters

The hearing established the research priorities and funding perspectives that informed the development of the 2018 , which dictates federal agricultural policy and funding for years.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Farmers and Ranchers

Agricultural research funded through the Farm Bill directly impacts the technology, seeds, and practices available to producers.

Directly affected

Agricultural Research Institutions

These institutions rely on federal funding and policy direction established in the Farm Bill to conduct their work.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on June 15, 2017, before the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
  • The primary purpose was to gather expert testimony to inform the 2018 Farm Bill.
  • Testimony was provided by two panels of experts, including USDA officials, university deans, and private sector representatives.
  • The hearing included written responses to follow-up questions from various Senators regarding research funding and policy.
Show all 5 facts
  • The document includes an appendix with prepared statements from all witnesses and submitted records.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to discuss the successes and future needs of agricultural research to help shape the 2018 .
Who testified at the hearing?
Witnesses included officials from the USDA, the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research, Kansas State University, Georgia Tech Research Institute, and Nueta Hidatsa Sahnish College, as well as a private farmer.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Research Integration

The hearing highlights a concerted effort to bridge the gap between federal research agencies, academic institutions, and private sector implementation.

Connected Entities

Pat Roberts, Agricultural Research Service, National Institute of Food and Agriculture and 3 more
PersonPat Roberts“Chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry”Map →
OrganizationAgricultural Research Service“USDA agency represented by Dr. Chavonda Jacobs-Young”Map →
OrganizationNational Institute of Food and Agriculture“USDA agency represented by Dr. Sonny Ramaswamy”Map →
PersonDebbie Stabenow“U.S. Senator from Michigan”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Agriculture“Federal department overseeing agricultural research”Map →
OrganizationFoundation for Food and Agriculture Research“Non-profit organization represented by Dr. Sally Rockey”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record