POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act (H.R. 6996)

Original title: Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act

Last action · April 22, 2026: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 37 - 7.Sponsors: Randy Fine and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill proposes a federal strategy to promote the global export of U.S.-made artificial intelligence systems, hardware, and standards. It directs the Departments of Commerce and State to create industry partnerships, reduce foreign trade barriers, and implement security measures to ensure U.S. technology is not accessed by foreign adversaries.

Why it matters

The bill mandates new federal programs and reporting requirements to prioritize the global adoption of U.S. AI technology, which could impact the export operations of American tech firms and influence international technology standards.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. Artificial Intelligence Companies

These firms may participate in new industry consortia and receive federal support to reduce barriers when exporting AI technology.

Directly affected

Department of Commerce

The agency is required to establish new programs, manage industry proposals, and submit multiple reports to Congress.

Directly affected

Department of State

The agency is required to develop a new diplomatic strategy and conduct a study on the global impact of AI deployment.

Key Facts

  • The Secretary of Commerce must establish a program for industry consortia to facilitate the export of the 'U.S. full AI stack' to allies.
  • The Secretary of State must establish a diplomatic strategy within 180 days to address foreign barriers to U.S. AI exports.
  • The Secretary of State, in coordination with the DNI and Commerce, must conduct a study on the impact of global AI deployment, due within 180 days.
  • The Secretary of Commerce must report on the development of security measures to prevent unauthorized foreign adversary access to U.S. AI technology within 180 days.
Show all 9 facts
  • The bill defines the 'U.S. full AI stack' as AI models, cloud operators, data centers, and semiconductors designed or owned by U.S. firms.
  • The Secretary of Commerce must submit a report on the status of the industry consortia program within 180 days of its establishment.
  • The Secretary of State must submit a report on the results of the global AI deployment study within 180 days of enactment.
  • The Secretary of Commerce must submit a report on the implementation of security measures for AI exports within 180 days of enactment.
  • The bill authorizes the use of classified annexes for reports regarding security measures and global AI deployment studies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 'U.S. full AI stack'?
The bill defines it as AI models developed in the U.S., run by U.S. cloud operators, hosted in data centers owned or operated by U.S. firms, and functioning on U.S.-designed AI semiconductors.
What is the goal of the industry consortia program?
The program aims to identify and receive proposals from industry groups that meet U.S. security standards to help export U.S. AI technology to allies and partners.
How will the government address foreign barriers to U.S. AI exports?
The Secretary of State is directed to hold industry listening sessions, establish an industry hotline, and use diplomatic channels to advocate for U.S. AI standards.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Apr 22, 2026HouseCommittee
    Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 37 - 7.
  2. Apr 22, 2026House
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  3. Jan 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
  4. Jan 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Full-Stack Sovereignty

The bill marks a shift from regulating individual AI components to promoting a 'full stack' approach, ensuring that every layer of AI infrastructure—from chips to cloud—is U.S.-controlled.

Connected Entities

Mr. Fine, Secretary of Commerce, Secretary of State and 3 more
PersonMr. Fine“Member of the House of Representatives who introduced the bill”Map →
OrganizationSecretary of Commerce“Tasked with creating industry consortia and reporting on export programs”Map →
OrganizationSecretary of State“Tasked with diplomatic strategy and reducing foreign trade barriers”Map →
OrganizationSecretary of Defense“Consulted on security measures for AI exports”Map →
OrganizationNational Intelligence, Director“Consulted for the study on global AI deployment”Map →
OrganizationSecretary of Energy“Consulted on security measures for AI exports”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record