POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Senate Bill 961 requires agencies to identify two existing rules for repeal for every new rule proposed

Original title: Relating to rule-making policies

Last action · February 20, 2026: To FinanceSponsors: Tom Willis and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

West Virginia Senate Bill 961 requires executive agencies to identify at least two existing rules for repeal whenever they propose a new rule, and eliminates past agency reporting requirements to the Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee.

Why it matters

State executive agencies must find and recommend two current regulations for elimination every time they initiate a new rule, altering how regulations are maintained across all state departments.

Background
  • West Virginia's Chapter 29A governs the state's Administrative Procedures Act, which dictates how executive branch agencies propose, review, and adopt administrative rules. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

executive agencies with rule-making authority

Executive agencies must identify at least two existing rules for repeal whenever they propose a new rule.

Directly affected

Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee

The committee is relieved of receiving the specific 2017 and 2020 agency reports previously mandated by statute.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does an executive agency have to do when proposing a new rule under this bill?
Whenever an executive agency publicly proposes or a new rule, it must make a good faith effort to identify at least two existing rules that may be considered for repeal by the legislature.
Does this bill remove any past reporting requirements?
Yes, the bill eliminates the 2017 and 2020 reports previously required to be submitted to the Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Feb 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Finance
  2. Feb 20, 2026Senate
    Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance
  3. Feb 17, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Judiciary
  4. Feb 17, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced in Senate
  5. Feb 17, 2026SenateCommittee
    To Judiciary then Finance
  6. Feb 17, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Joint Committee on Government and Finance, Darren Thorne, Tom Willis and 3 more
OrganizationJoint Committee on Government and Finance“Committee previously designated to receive stringency reports”Map →
PersonDarren Thorne“Co-sponsor of Senate Bill 961”Map →
PersonTom Willis“Lead sponsor of Senate Bill 961”Map →
PersonEric Tarr“Co-sponsor of Senate Bill 961”Map →
OrganizationLegislative Rule-Making Review Committee“Committee receiving agency rule-making reports”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on the Judiciary“Senate committee reporting the committee substitute bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record