POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Florida requires sheriffs to support college guardian programs and creates a 1,000-foot school weapon discharge felony

Original title: School Safety

Last action · March 11, 2026: Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 757 (Ch. 2026-80) -SJ 824Sponsor: Don Gaetz

Companion · HB 757same policy, House version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Sheriffs must assist public postsecondary educational institutions in implementing guardian programs, and discharging a weapon within 1,000 feet of a school becomes a second-degree felony requiring custody until bail hearings starting October 1, 2026. Additionally, public colleges and universities must adopt active assailant response plans, mental health awareness signage, family reunification plans, and threat management processes.

Why it matters

The measure alters campus security protocols across Florida's public higher education system by extending guardian training and threat assessment mandates previously restricted to K-12 schools, while imposing strict mandatory pre-trial detention for firearm discharges near educational facilities.

Background
  • Florida law establishes comprehensive campus and school safety frameworks, including safe-school officers and guardian programs originally designed for K-12 school districts. context
  • The Office of Safe Schools operates within the Florida Department of Education as a central repository for training standards and compliance oversight. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Sheriffs

Sheriffs are required to assist public postsecondary educational institutions with guardian programs, provide required training, and report certification data to the Department of Law Enforcement.

Directly affected

Public postsecondary educational institutions

Colleges and universities must adopt active assailant response plans, establish threat management teams, promote suspicious activity reporting tools, and conduct annual security risk assessments.

Directly affected

Students and employees

Faculty, staff, and students are subject to new campus safety drills, active assailant training requirements, and threat assessment record-sharing upon transfer.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can students serve as school guardians at public colleges or universities?
No. Employees or faculty members who are not students may serve as school guardians upon satisfactory completion of requirements and sheriff certification.
What happens if a weapon or firearm is discharged within 1,000 feet of a school?
It constitutes a felony of the second degree, and any person arrested for this offense must be held in custody until brought before the court for a bail hearing.
Are public postsecondary institutions required to conduct security risk assessments?
Yes, they must annually collaborate with public safety agencies to conduct a security risk assessment using the or a comparable approved tool.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Check Your Understanding

1.According to the Committee Substitute 2 for the school safety bill, what actions must each public postsecondary educational institution take regarding the mobile suspicious activity reporting tool?

2.According to the Committee Substitute 2 for the school safety bill, what does the text require sheriffs to do regarding public postsecondary educational institutions?

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Tabled in the Senate.

Procedural history

20 actions
  1. Mar 11, 2026Senate
    Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 757 (Ch. 2026-80) -SJ 824
  2. Mar 11, 2026Senate
    Substituted CS/CS/HB 757 -SJ 824
  3. Mar 11, 2026SenateFloor
    Read 2nd time -SJ 824
  4. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    Retained on Special Order Calendar -SJ 747
  5. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/10/26
  6. Feb 25, 2026SenateIntroduced
    CS/CS by Appropriations read 1st time
Show 14 earlier actions
  1. Feb 25, 2026Senate
    Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
  2. Feb 25, 2026Senate
    Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
  3. Feb 24, 2026SenateCommittee
    CS/CS by- Appropriations; YEAS 11 NAYS 6
  4. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    On Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 02/24/26, 9:00 am, 110 Senate Building
  5. Feb 18, 2026SenateIntroduced
    CS by Criminal Justice read 1st time
  6. Feb 13, 2026SenateCommittee
    Now in Appropriations
  7. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Remaining references corrected to Appropriations
  8. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Original reference(s) removed: Appropriations Committee on Higher Education; Rules
  9. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
  10. Feb 11, 2026SenateCommittee
    CS by Criminal Justice; YEAS 7 NAYS 1
  11. Feb 6, 2026Senate
    On Committee agenda-- Criminal Justice, 02/11/26, 3:00 pm, 37 Senate Building
  12. Jan 13, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced
  13. Dec 16, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to Criminal Justice; Appropriations Committee on Higher Education; Rules
  14. Dec 12, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Filed

Version history & redline

6 versions on file

Official version history is partial: 3 linked texts are unavailable or incomplete. Source links remain available below.

Comparing Committee Substitute 1 → Committee Substitute 2
removed addedOfficial text

The text diff for this stage has not been computed yet.

official version host penalty: 429 Retry-After 300 s

Redline computed from the official version text (record lane).View this version →

Voting Record

Show 3 earlier roll calls
Motion succeededSenate2/11/2026Florida LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Criminal Justice: Favorable with Committee Substitute on S 896 Filed

Total

8

Yes
7
No
1
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0

Finance Connection

Notable money activity
$38,000across 20 reported contributions
Trace money trail →
CandidateDonorAmountIndustryDate
Don GaetzDON GAETZ CAMPAIGN$19,000CANDIDATE CAMPAIGNJan 2025
Don GaetzALLIANCE FOR HONEST GOVERNMENT$1,000POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONDec 2025
Don GaetzARROW GROUP$1,000GOVERNMENT RELATIONSJan 2026
Don GaetzASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC.$1,000PHARMACEUTICALSMar 2025
Don GaetzBOOK PATRICIA$1,000CONFECTIONSDec 2025
Don GaetzBOOK RONALD L.$1,000GOVERNMENT RELATIONSDec 2025
Don GaetzCAPITOL ALLIANCE GROUP, INC.$1,000GOVERNMENT RELATIONSDec 2025
Don GaetzCC NORTH CENTRAL, LLC$1,000DEVELOPMENTNov 2025
Show 12 more contributions
Don GaetzCCC$1,000POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONDec 2025
Don GaetzVOLUSIA RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION, LLC$1,000CONSTRUCTIONNov 2025
Don GaetzTHE MAYERNICK GROUP, LLC$1,000LAW FIRMDec 2025
Don GaetzVENTURE DEVELOPMENT REALTY, INC.$1,000REAL ESTATENov 2025
Don GaetzACADIA HEALTHCARE COMPANY INC. PAC$1,000POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONNov 2025
Don GaetzFLORIDA RESTAURANT & LODGING ASSN. PAC INC$1,000POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONDec 2025
Don GaetzGALMOR HOLDINGS, INC.$1,000LAND DEVELOPMENTNov 2025
Don GaetzHCA NORTH FLORIDA DIVISION & GOOD GOVT. PAC$1,000POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONNov 2025
Don GaetzHCA WEST FLORIDA DIVISION & GOOD GOVT. PAC$1,000POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONNov 2025
Don GaetzICI HOMES OF TAMPA, LLC$1,000DEVELOPMENTNov 2025
Don GaetzICI HOMES RESIDENTIAL HOLDINGS, LLC$1,000REAL ESTATENov 2025
Don GaetzINTERVEST CONSTRUCTION OF JAX, INC.$1,000CONSTRUCTIONNov 2025

Reported financial relationships and timing signals. This does not prove motive or influence. Readers draw their own conclusions.

Lobbying Activity

on behalf of Florida Association of School Safety Specialists (FS3)

2026

Lobbyist registryView filing →

on behalf of Florida Association of School Safety Specialists (FS3)

2026

Lobbyist registryView filing →

on behalf of Florida Association of School Safety Specialists (FS3)

2026

Lobbyist registryView filing →

on behalf of Florida Association of School Safety Specialists (FS3)

2026

Lobbyist registryView filing →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Extension of K-12 Safety Frameworks to Higher Education

The legislation formally bridges K-12 school safety mandates—such as guardian programs, threat management teams, and suspicious reporting tools—over to public colleges and universities.

Connected Entities

Board of Governors, State Board of Education, Senate Committee on Rules and 9 more
OrganizationBoard of Governors“Adopts regulations regarding state university safety rules and student record tr”Map →
OrganizationState Board of Education“Adopts rules and regulations regarding educational records and postsecondary saf”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Rules“Committee reviewing the bill”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Law Enforcement“Maintains lists of school guardians, provides guiding principles, and handles me”Map →
OrganizationSenate Appropriations Committee on Higher Education“Committee reviewing the bill”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Criminal Justice“Committee reviewing the bill”Map →
OrganizationChris Hixon, Coach Aaron Feis, and Coach Scott Beigel Guardian Program“The state-mandated guardian program extended to public postsecondary educational”Map →
locationSenate Building“Meeting location”Map →
bill numberCS“Committee Substitute”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Safe Schools“Develops school security risk assessment tools and behavioral threat assessment ”Map →
bill numberCS/CS“Committee Substitute”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Appropriations“Current committee”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.flsenate.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record