POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

New Jersey bill requires campus police officers to wear body-worn cameras

Original title: Requires campus police officers to wear body worn cameras.

Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Public Safety and Preparedness CommitteeSponsors: Carol Murphy and 2 others

Companion · S 808same policy, Senate version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This legislation requires all campus police officers in New Jersey to wear body-worn cameras that record audio and video during official duties, matching requirements currently placed on State, county, and municipal patrol officers.

Why it matters

Expands mandatory video and audio recording requirements to university and college police departments across the state, altering daily operational protocols for campus law enforcement personnel and changing evidentiary standards for campus incidents.

Background
  • New Jersey previously enacted laws in 2020 requiring uniformed State, county, and municipal patrol law enforcement officers to wear body-worn cameras. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Campus police officers

Campus police officers must wear body-worn cameras during official duties, adhere to recording and deactivation guidelines, and follow specific retention and reporting rules.

Directly affected

Students and campus visitors

Interactions between members of the public and campus police officers will be audio and video recorded, subject to notification rules and privacy exceptions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are campus police officers required to wear body-worn cameras under this bill?
Yes, the legislation amends existing law to explicitly require campus police officers to wear body-worn cameras that record audio and video while performing official duties.
How will the body-worn cameras for campus police be funded?
They may be funded through annual appropriations, forfeiture funds in an amount determined by the Attorney General, federal grants, or other available funding sources.
When does this requirement take effect?
The act takes effect on the first day of the seventh month next following enactment.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly Public Safety and Preparedness Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Division of Criminal Justice, Carol A. Murphy, Verlina Reynolds-Jackson and 2 more
OrganizationDivision of Criminal Justice“Agency whose detectives or investigators have specific recording exemptions unde”Map →
PersonCarol A. Murphy“Assemblywoman sponsoring the bill.”Map →
PersonVerlina Reynolds-Jackson“Assemblywoman sponsoring the bill.”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body enacting the bill.”Map →
PersonAnnette Quijano“Assemblywoman co-sponsoring the bill.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record