POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Senate Oversight Hearing on the EPA Superfund Program

Original title: OVERSIGHT OF THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S SUPERFUND PROGRAM

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addresses the management and speed of the federal program, which dictates how contaminated sites across the U.S. are cleaned up and how taxpayer funds are allocated for environmental remediation.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Potentially Responsible Parties

These entities are identified by the EPA as having potential liability for the cleanup of hazardous waste sites.

State Environmental Agencies

These agencies collaborate with the EPA on the management and execution of site cleanups.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript of a 2017 Senate subcommittee hearing focused on the efficiency and management of the EPA's program. The hearing examined how the federal government, states, and local communities collaborate to clean up hazardous waste sites and explored ways to accelerate the cleanup process.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on August 1, 2017, by the Subcommittee on Superfund, Waste Management, and Regulatory Oversight.
  • The primary focus was the oversight of the EPA's Superfund program, established by the 1980 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
  • The program provides federal authority to clean up hazardous waste sites, respond to environmental emergencies, oil spills, and natural disasters.
  • The program utilizes a dedicated trust fund for the cleanup of abandoned waste sites.
  • The EPA has the authority to work with 'Potentially Responsible Parties' to facilitate site cleanups.
  • The hearing included testimony from three expert witnesses regarding their experiences with EPA cleanup processes.
  • The subcommittee discussed methods to complete environmental cleanups more quickly and efficiently while managing taxpayer dollars.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Superfund program?
It is a federal program created by the 1980 law that gives the EPA the authority to clean up contaminated hazardous waste sites and respond to environmental emergencies.
What was the purpose of this specific hearing?
The subcommittee met to review how the program is managed and to hear expert suggestions on how to make the cleanup process faster and more cost-effective.

Why It Matters

The hearing addresses the management and speed of the federal program, which dictates how contaminated sites across the U.S. are cleaned up and how taxpayer funds are allocated for environmental remediation.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Efficiency

The hearing reflects a 2017 legislative push to prioritize the speed and cost-efficiency of environmental cleanups over other program metrics.

Connected Entities

personKatherine N. ProbstWitness, Independent ConsultantMap →
organizationEnvironmental Protection AgencyFederal agency responsible for the Superfund programMap →
personKamala HarrisU.S. Senator from California and subcommittee memberMap →
personJeffery A. SteersWitness, Director of Regional Operations, Virginia Department of Environmental QMap →
personMike RoundsU.S. Senator from South Dakota and Chairman of the SubcommitteeMap →
otherCERCLAComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980Map →
personSteven C. NadeauWitness, Partner at Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn, LLPMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record