POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofZoning →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Zoning Change Request for 4020 N Frontage Rd.

Original title: Application Number: RZ-PD 24-0921 Applicant: TRUE BUILDERS, INC. / ISSAC J. TURPIN Location: 4020 N Frontage Rd. Folio Number: 90391.0600 Acreage: 2.45 acres, more or less Comprehensive Plan: RES-1 Service Area: Rural Community Plan: None Existing Zoning: ASC-1 Request: Rezone to PD RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Hearing Master: Approval Development Services: Approvable, Subject to Conditions Planning Commission: Inconsistent with Plan

Record date · April 7, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

This document outlines a request to rezone a 2.45-acre property at 4020 N Frontage Rd. from its current agricultural designation to a Planned Development () status. The application has received mixed recommendations from various local planning and development departments.

Why it matters

The approval of this rezoning request changes the legal land-use designation for the 2.45-acre site, which dictates what type of development can occur on the property.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

TRUE BUILDERS, INC.

The applicant is seeking a change in land-use designation to allow for specific development on the property.

Indirectly affected

Local Residents

Residents in the vicinity of 4020 N Frontage Rd. may see changes in land use or development density resulting from the rezoning.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does it mean to rezone a property to 'PD'?
stands for Planned Development, which is a zoning designation that allows for more flexible land-use regulations compared to standard zoning categories like .
Why did the Planning Commission say the request is inconsistent?
The document states the request is inconsistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan, which typically guides long-term land use and density goals for the area.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Conflict in Planning Recommendations

There is a notable discrepancy between the Zoning Hearing Master's approval and the Planning Commission's finding of inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan.

Connected Entities

ISSAC J. TURPIN, 4020 N Frontage Rd., Issac J. Turpin and 4 more
PersonISSAC J. TURPIN“The individual associated with the application.”Map →
location4020 N Frontage Rd.“The specific property address subject to the rezoning request.”Map →
OrganizationTRUE BUILDERS, INC.“The company requesting the zoning change.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record