POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Kentucky updates theft by deception laws to establish bad check fees and real estate listing rules

Original title: AN ACT relating to theft by deception.

Last action · April 13, 2026: signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 106)Sponsors: Marianne Proctor and 7 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Kentucky HB 264 expands statutes to include listing real estate without legal title, establishes county attorney fees for bounced checks, and adjusts criminal penalties based on the financial value involved or if offenses occur during a declared disaster.

Why it matters

Changes criminal charges and financial penalties for individuals accused of passing bad checks or engaging in deceptive property listings, while authorizing county attorneys to collect operating fees from recovered funds.

Background
  • The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky serves as the state's primary legislative body. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Property buyers and sellers

Listings of residential, commercial, or vacant land without legal title are explicitly classified under theft by deception presumptions.

Directly affected

Check issuers

Issuing checks for taxes, child support, or general property without sufficient funds can result in graduated misdemeanor or felony charges.

Directly affected

County attorney offices

Offices are authorized to charge a $50 fee for handling bounced check notices, with funds restricted to operating expenses.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if someone lists a property for rent without legal title?
The person is legally presumed to have created or reinforced a false impression of deception, constituting .
Can multiple theft by deception offenses be combined?
Yes, if a person commits two or more separate offenses within ninety days, the offenses may be combined and treated as a single offense, and property values may be aggregated.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

13 actions
  1. Apr 13, 2026HouseEnrolled
    signed by Governor (Acts Ch. 106)
  2. Apr 1, 2026HouseEnrolled
    enrolled, signed by Speaker of the House enrolled, signed by President of the Senate delivered to Governor
  3. Mar 31, 2026HouseFloor
    3rd reading, passed 38-0 received in House
  4. Mar 27, 2026House
    posted for passage in the Regular Orders of the Day for Tuesday, March 31 2026
  5. Mar 20, 2026HouseFloor
    2nd reading, to Rules
  6. Mar 19, 2026House
    reported favorably, 1st reading, to Calendar
Show 7 earlier actions
  1. Mar 16, 2026SenateCommittee
    to Judiciary (S)
  2. Feb 17, 2026SenateIntroduced
    received in Senate to Committee on Committees (S)
  3. Feb 13, 2026HouseFloor
    3rd reading, passed 93-0 with Floor Amendment (1)
  4. Feb 12, 2026HouseFloor
    2nd reading, to Rules floor amendment (1) filed posted for passage in the Regular Orders of the Day for Friday, February 13 2026
  5. Feb 11, 2026House
    reported favorably, 1st reading, to Calendar
  6. Jan 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    to Judiciary (H)
  7. Jan 8, 2026HouseIntroduced
    introduced in House to Committee on Committees (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Deception Criteria

The legislation explicitly broadens the application of theft by deception to include unauthorized real estate advertising and unpaid tax or child support checks.

Connected Entities

General Assembly
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Enacting body for Kentucky legislation”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.legislature.ky.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record