Changes to School Funding and Scholarship Rules
May 12, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
School districts facing student population loss will receive additional state funding, with a priority for s, while scholarship account holders face stricter deadlines for fund usage.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
School districts
Districts with declining enrollment will receive supplemental funding, with higher rates for fiscally constrained districts.
New Worlds Scholarship recipients
Recipients face new conditions for account closure based on inactivity or program abuse.
Last recorded activity May 12, 2026.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Why It Matters
School districts facing student population loss will receive additional state funding, with a priority for s, while scholarship account holders face stricter deadlines for fund usage.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happens to my New Worlds Scholarship account if I don't use it?
How does the new declining enrollment supplement work?
News Coverage
Voting Record
Passage, Third Reading
Total
119
Yes
100
No
4
Present
0
Not Voting
15
Abstain
0
How they voted (119)
Chase Tramont
Republican · yes
James Buchanan
Republican · yes
Bill Partington
Republican · yes
Ryan Chamberlin
Republican · yes
Kevin Steele
Republican · yes
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
Kim Kendall
Republican · yes
Sam Greco
Republican · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · yes
Doug Bankson
Republican · yes
Wallace Aristide
Democratic · yes
Linda Chaney
Republican · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Ashley Gantt
Democratic · not voting
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · not voting
Dana Trabulsy
Republican · yes
Michelle Salzman
Republican · yes
Anne Gerwig
Republican · yes
Kevin Chambliss
Democratic · yes
Yvonne Hinson
Democratic · not voting
Karen Gonzalez Pittman
Republican · yes
Jeff Holcomb
Republican · yes
Michele Rayner
Democratic · no
Lisa Dunkley
Democratic · yes
+ 95 more
Third Reading
Total
40
Yes
32
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (40)
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
Ralph Massullo
Republican · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · excused
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · excused
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Carlos Smith
Democratic · yes
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · excused
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · excused
Barbara Sharief
Democratic · excused
Tina Polsky
Democratic · excused
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · yes
Joe Gruters
Republican · excused
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · excused
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
+ 16 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Prioritization of Fiscally Constrained Districts
The bill explicitly mandates a tiered funding approach that favors fiscally constrained districts over others in the event of enrollment decline.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance80How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy30Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools