POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

North Carolina Eliminates PET Scanners from Certificate of Need Review

Original title: Eliminate PET Scanners from CON Review.

Last action · April 3, 2025: Ref to the Com on Health, if favorable, Regulatory Reform, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House (House action)Sponsors: Grant Campbell and 6 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

North Carolina repeals the requirement that positron emission tomography (PET) scanners undergo prior to purchase, effective when the act becomes law.

Why it matters

Alters the regulatory approval process for healthcare facilities seeking to acquire PET imaging equipment in North Carolina.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Health care providers

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does House Bill 664 change?
It removes positron emission tomography (PET) scanners from the state's process.
When does this change take effect?
The act becomes effective as soon as it becomes law.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Apr 3, 2025House
    Ref to the Com on Health, if favorable, Regulatory Reform, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  2. Apr 3, 2025House
    Passed 1st Reading
  3. Apr 1, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

G.S. 131E-176(16)f1.8., General Assembly of North Carolina
otherG.S. 131E-176(16)f1.8.“The statutory provision being repealed by the bill.”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly of North Carolina“The state legislative body enacting the bill.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record