POLISCOPE
Back to feed
CALACCESS COUNTYlobbying

Lobbying Disclosure: United Domestic Workers of America (Q1 2000)

Original title: NIELSEN MERKSAMER PARRINELLO MUELLER & NAYLOR LLP lobbying for UNITED DOMESTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA AFSCME AFL-CIO

June 20, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This report accounts for $723.80 in payments made by a labor union to a firm, clarifying that these funds were for services rendered in a previous quarter rather than new legislative activity.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

United Domestic Workers of America AFSCME AFL-CIO

The organization is the entity responsible for the reported lobbying expenditures.

Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP

The firm is the recipient of the lobbying payments disclosed in the report.

What changed

Last recorded activity June 20, 2026.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document discloses payments made by the United Domestic Workers of America to the law firm Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Mueller & Naylor LLP for the first quarter of 2000. The report indicates that no active lobbying occurred during this specific period.

Key Facts

  • Total payments reported for the period of 1/1/2000 to 3/31/2000 amount to $723.80.
  • The lobbying firm reported no active lobbying on legislation during the first quarter of 2000.
  • The reported payments were designated for services provided during the second quarter of 1999.

Why It Matters

This report accounts for $723.80 in payments made by a labor union to a firm, clarifying that these funds were for services rendered in a previous quarter rather than new legislative activity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did the United Domestic Workers of America lobby for any specific bills during this period?
No, the report explicitly states that no legislation was actively lobbied during this quarter.
Why were payments made if no lobbying occurred?
The document notes that the payments were for services rendered in the second quarter of 1999.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

financial connection100% confidence

Delayed Payment Reporting

The report highlights a significant time lag between the service period (Q2 1999) and the payment disclosure (Q1 2000).

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

www.sos.ca.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance15
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy0
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment0
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record