POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Summary of 2017 Senate Foreign Relations Committee Nomination Hearings

Original title: NOMINATION HEARINGS OF THE 115TH CONGRESS-FIRST SESSION

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This record documents the formal vetting process for key U.S. foreign policy officials, confirming the individuals responsible for representing American interests abroad and managing international development programs.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Nominees for diplomatic and agency positions

These individuals underwent the Senate confirmation process to determine their suitability for federal appointments.

Senate Committee on Foreign Relations

The committee members were responsible for questioning nominees and voting on their confirmation.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a printed record of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations hearings held throughout 2017. It lists the dates and nominees for various diplomatic and agency positions, including ambassadors and State Department officials.

Key Facts

  • The document serves as an official index of nomination hearings held by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations between January 3, 2017, and January 3, 2018.
  • Hearings were conducted for numerous diplomatic posts, including ambassadors to Israel, China, Japan, New Zealand, the Holy See, and various African and Latin American nations.
  • The committee held hearings for high-level State Department positions, including Secretary of State and Deputy Secretary of State.
  • The committee held hearings for leadership roles at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).
  • Nominees for U.S. representation at international bodies, including the United Nations and NATO, were vetted during these sessions.
  • The document notes that transcripts for specific nominees, such as Rex Tillerson and Nikki Haley, were printed under separate covers.

Why It Matters

This record documents the formal vetting process for key U.S. foreign policy officials, confirming the individuals responsible for representing American interests abroad and managing international development programs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this document?
It is a formal record listing the dates and subjects of Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings held in 2017 regarding the confirmation of presidential nominees.
Does this document contain the actual testimony of the nominees?
No, this document acts as an index. It notes that some transcripts were printed s and provides page numbers for others.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

temporal pattern90% confidence

High Volume of Confirmations

The committee held a high frequency of nomination hearings between April and July 2017, indicating a concentrated period of staffing for the executive branch.

Connected Entities

personNikki HaleyNominee for Ambassador to the United Nations.Map →
personRex TillersonNominee for Secretary of State.Map →
personKay Bailey HutchisonNominee for U.S. Permanent Representative to NATO.Map →
personTerry BranstadNominee for Ambassador to China.Map →
personBob CorkerChairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.Map →
organizationSenate Committee on Foreign RelationsThe committee responsible for conducting the nomination hearings.Map →
personDavid FriedmanNominee for Ambassador to Israel.Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record