Hearing on the National Biomedical Heart, Lung, and Blood Research Act of 1975
July 19, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The hearing initiated the legislative process for S. 988, which determined the federal funding levels and research priorities for heart, lung, and blood disease programs under the National Heart and Lung Institute.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
National Heart and Lung Institute
The institute's programs and research training awards were subject to revision and extension under the proposed bill.
Medical researchers
Researchers eligible for National Research Service Awards were affected by the proposed changes to the program's structure and funding.
Last recorded activity July 19, 2026.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing was held on March 17, 1975, by the Senate Subcommittee on Health.
- The subject of the hearing was S. 988, the National Biomedical Heart, Lung, Blood, Blood Vessel, and Research Training Act of 1975.
- The bill proposed amendments to the Public Health Service Act.
- The legislation aimed to revise and extend the programs of the National Heart and Lung Institute.
- The legislation aimed to revise and extend the National Research Service Awards.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of the March 17, 1975 hearing?
Which government agency was the focus of this legislation?
Why It Matters
The hearing initiated the legislative process for S. 988, which determined the federal funding levels and research priorities for heart, lung, and blood disease programs under the National Heart and Lung Institute.
News Coverage
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expansion of Research Scope
The bill explicitly sought to add 'blood vessel' research to the existing mandate of the National Heart and Lung Institute.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools