POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proposed $215,000 Consulting Contract for Administrative Efficiency

Original title: Consider recommendations regarding the Serrano Advisors LLC Agreement for Administrative Efficiencies and Cost Savings Consulting Services for Fiscal Year 2026-2027, as follows: a) Approve and authorize the Chair to execute an Agreement for Services of Independent Contractor with Serrano Advisors, LLC for Administrative Efficiencies and Cost Saving, for a period of performance from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. This agreement includes a total maximum contract amount not to exceed $215,000.00; and b) Determine that the above-recommended action is not a project that is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4), finding that the action is a governmental funding mechanisms and/or fiscal activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

Record date · June 23, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The Board of Supervisors is considering a one-year contract with Serrano Advisors, LLC to provide consulting services focused on administrative efficiency and cost savings. The proposed agreement would run from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, with a maximum cost of $215,000.

Why it matters

This action authorizes the expenditure of $215,000 in public funds for external consulting services to evaluate and potentially modify internal government administrative processes.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Serrano Advisors, LLC

The firm is the proposed recipient of a $215,000 contract for consulting services.

Indirectly affected

Taxpayers

Public funds are being allocated to pay for the consulting services provided by the contractor.

Key Facts

  • The Board of Supervisors is considering a contract with Serrano Advisors, LLC for administrative efficiency and cost-saving consulting.
  • The contract period is set for July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027.
  • The maximum total cost for the contract is $215,000.00.
  • The action is proposed to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under section 15378(b)(4).
Show all 6 facts
  • The exemption is based on the finding that the contract is a fiscal activity that does not cause physical environmental changes.
  • The file number for this agenda item is 26-00535.

Frequently Asked Questions

What will Serrano Advisors, LLC do for the government?
The firm is contracted to provide consulting services specifically aimed at administrative efficiencies and cost savings.
Why is this contract exempt from environmental review?
The Board determined that the contract is a fiscal and funding activity that does not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Planning

The document indicates the government is proactively budgeting for administrative efficiency consulting for the upcoming 2026-2027 fiscal year.

Connected Entities

California Environmental Quality Act, Board of Supervisors, Serrano Advisors, LLC
otherCalifornia Environmental Quality Act“The regulatory framework cited for the environmental review exemption.”Map →
OrganizationBoard of Supervisors“The governing body considering the contract approval.”Map →
OrganizationSerrano Advisors, LLC“The proposed independent contractor for consulting services.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance35
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record