POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Senate Armed Services Committee Hearings on Afghanistan (2015)

Original title: THE SITUATION IN AFGHANISTAN

Record date · January 1, 2016

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This document contains the official record of three Senate Armed Services Committee hearings held in 2015 regarding the security situation and U.S. military efforts in Afghanistan. It includes testimony from former ambassadors, military commanders, and counterterrorism experts on the progress and challenges of the mission.

Why it matters

The hearings provide the official legislative record of the U.S. military's strategic assessment of the Afghanistan mission during the transition to Afghan-led security forces.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

U.S. Military Personnel

Military members are responsible for executing the mission and security operations in Afghanistan.

Directly affected

Afghan National Security Forces

These forces are responsible for leading security operations and safeguarding the country.

Key Facts

  • The committee held hearings on February 11, February 12, and October 6, 2015, regarding the situation in Afghanistan.
  • Over 2,200 Americans have died in the Afghanistan conflict since 2001.
  • Afghan school enrollment increased from less than 1 million in 2001 to almost 10 million by 2015.
  • 40% of Afghan students and 40% of Afghan teachers were female as of 2015.
Show all 8 facts
  • Afghan life expectancy increased by over 20 years between 2001 and 2015.
  • Polling data cited indicated less than 10% of the Afghan population supported the Taliban, while over 70% expressed confidence in the Afghan military.
  • The Afghan National Security Forces were officially leading the fight and responsible for national security during this period.
  • General Mattis provided testimony stating that gains made in Afghanistan are reversible.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of these hearings?
The hearings were held to receive expert testimony on the security situation in Afghanistan and to evaluate the progress of U.S. efforts to sustain gains made since 2001.
Who testified before the committee?
Witnesses included former U.S. Ambassadors James Cunningham and Ryan Crocker, former Special Operations Commander Admiral Eric Olson, former National Counterterrorism Center Director Michael Leiter, and General John F. Campbell.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Transition to Afghan-led Security

The hearings document the strategic shift where Afghan National Security Forces assumed primary responsibility for the country's defense.

Connected Entities

James B. Cunningham, Michael E. Leiter, John F. Campbell and 4 more
PersonJames B. Cunningham“Former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan”Map →
PersonMichael E. Leiter“Former Director, U.S. National Counterterrorism Center”Map →
PersonJohn F. Campbell“Commander, Resolute Support Mission and U.S. Forces-Afghanistan”Map →
PersonJohn McCain“Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Armed Services“Congressional committee overseeing the Department of Defense”Map →
PersonEric T. Olson“Former Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command”Map →
PersonRyan C. Crocker“Former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record