POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Senate Hearing on 2016 Election Security and Future Protections

Original title: OPEN HEARING: ELECTION SECURITY

January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing establishes the federal government's ongoing role in providing cybersecurity support to state election systems, which directly impacts the security protocols and resources available to local jurisdictions for protecting voter data and ballot integrity.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

State Election Officials

These officials are responsible for implementing election security measures and coordinating with DHS for federal support.

Department of Homeland Security

The agency is tasked with evolving its cybersecurity services to meet the needs of state election systems.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2018.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence held an open hearing to review findings regarding foreign interference in the 2016 U.S. elections and to assess the current state of election infrastructure security. The hearing featured testimony from current and former Department of Homeland Security officials and election security experts on how federal agencies are supporting state-level election systems.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was convened to review the progress and findings of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections.
  • The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has evolved its role to provide increased support to states for securing election infrastructure since 2016.
  • Chairman Burr identified ongoing challenges including long wait times for DHS security services and difficulties in providing states with necessary information.
  • The committee noted that attributing cyber attacks quickly and authoritatively remains a significant technical and intelligence challenge.
  • Election administration remains primarily the responsibility of individual states, with the federal government acting in a support capacity.
  • The hearing included testimony from two panels covering both federal agency perspectives and state-level election administration experts.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is responsible for running elections in the United States?
The administration of elections is primarily the responsibility of individual states.
What is the role of the Department of Homeland Security in election security?
DHS provides support, cybersecurity assistance, and information sharing to help states secure their election systems.

Why It Matters

This hearing establishes the federal government's ongoing role in providing cybersecurity support to state election systems, which directly impacts the security protocols and resources available to local jurisdictions for protecting voter data and ballot integrity.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Show 2 more sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Evolution of DHS Role

The hearing highlights a clear transition in the DHS role from a reactive posture in 2016 to a more proactive support role for states by 2018.

Connected Entities

personJeh Charles JohnsonFormer Secretary of the Department of Homeland SecurityMap →
personKirstjen NielsenSecretary of the Department of Homeland SecurityMap →
personJeanette ManfraAssistant Secretary, Department of Homeland SecurityMap →
personJim CondosSecretary of State, State of VermontMap →
personRichard BurrChairman of the Senate Select Committee on IntelligenceMap →
personAmy CohenExecutive Director, National Association of State Election DirectorsMap →
personEric RosenbachCo-Director, Belfer Center for Science and International AffairsMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record