POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Senate Hearing on 2016 Election Security and Future Protections

Original title: OPEN HEARING: ELECTION SECURITY

Record date · January 1, 2018

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence held an open hearing to review findings regarding foreign interference in the 2016 U.S. elections and to assess the current state of election infrastructure security. The hearing featured testimony from current and former Department of Homeland Security officials and election security experts on how federal agencies are supporting state-level election systems.

Why it matters

This hearing establishes the federal government's ongoing role in providing cybersecurity support to state election systems, which directly impacts the security protocols and resources available to local jurisdictions for protecting voter data and ballot integrity.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State Election Officials

These officials are responsible for implementing election security measures and coordinating with DHS for federal support.

Directly affected

Department of Homeland Security

The agency is tasked with evolving its cybersecurity services to meet the needs of state election systems.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was convened to review the progress and findings of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections.
  • The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has evolved its role to provide increased support to states for securing election infrastructure since 2016.
  • Chairman Burr identified ongoing challenges including long wait times for DHS security services and difficulties in providing states with necessary information.
  • The committee noted that attributing cyber attacks quickly and authoritatively remains a significant technical and intelligence challenge.
Show all 6 facts
  • Election administration remains primarily the responsibility of individual states, with the federal government acting in a support capacity.
  • The hearing included testimony from two panels covering both federal agency perspectives and state-level election administration experts.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is responsible for running elections in the United States?
The administration of elections is primarily the responsibility of individual states.
What is the role of the Department of Homeland Security in election security?
DHS provides support, cybersecurity assistance, and information sharing to help states secure their election systems.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Evolution of DHS Role

The hearing highlights a clear transition in the DHS role from a reactive posture in 2016 to a more proactive support role for states by 2018.

Connected Entities

Richard Burr, Jeh Charles Johnson, Kirstjen Nielsen and 4 more
PersonRichard Burr“Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence”Map →
PersonJeh Charles Johnson“Former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security”Map →
PersonKirstjen Nielsen“Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security”Map →
PersonJeanette Manfra“Assistant Secretary, Department of Homeland Security”Map →
PersonJim Condos“Secretary of State, State of Vermont”Map →
PersonAmy Cohen“Executive Director, National Association of State Election Directors”Map →
PersonEric Rosenbach“Co-Director, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record