The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Wisconsin SB 1130 Establishes Ranked-Choice Voting for Federal, State, and Local Elections
Last action · May 13, 2026: Fiscal estimate receivedSponsors: Mark Spreitzer and 19 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
This bill requires for all federal, state, and local elections in Wisconsin, excluding recall elections. Under the measure, voters may rank candidates in order of preference, and votes are reallocated in subsequent rounds of counting until a candidate achieves a majority.
Changes the mechanics of how ballots are marked and how election winners are determined across all levels of government in Wisconsin, replacing traditional plurality voting with a multi-round preference elimination system.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Wisconsin voters
Voters are permitted to indicate sequential preferences for all candidates on the ballot for federal, state, and local offices.
counties and municipalities
Local governments administer elections and are eligible for state grants from the Elections Commission to update equipment and software.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does ranked-choice voting work under this bill?
Are recall elections subject to ranked-choice voting?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Failed in the Senate.
Procedural history
4 actions- May 13, 2026SenateFiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2026SenateFailed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
- Mar 19, 2026SenateIntroducedRead first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development
- Mar 19, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduced by Senators Spreitzer, Pfaff, Larson, Dassler-Alfheim and Roys; cosponsored by Representatives Anderson, Brown, Clancy, Emerson, Hong, Moore Omokunde, Rivera-Wagner, Sheehan, Sinicki, Subeck, Stroud, Stubbs, Tenorio, Udell and Palmeri
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 15 more sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
- Controversy90Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz60Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
