POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofIran
FEDERALhearing transcript
High Impact

Congressional Hearing on Iran's Military and Regional Influence

Original title: IRAN'S POWER PROJECTION CAPABILITY

January 1, 2017

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing assesses the national security implications of the 2015 nuclear deal, specifically focusing on how the potential influx of funds from could alter Iran's military spending and support for regional groups.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

U.S. Department of Defense

The agency is responsible for defending national security interests against potential shifts in regional power dynamics.

Middle Eastern proxy groups

These groups are identified as recipients of Iranian financial and military assistance.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript from a 2015 House Subcommittee hearing regarding Iran's military capabilities and regional influence. The committee examined how potential might impact Iran's ability to fund and advance its foreign policy agenda.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on November 5, 2015, by the Subcommittee on National Security.
  • The committee reviewed the impact of the Obama administration's nuclear deal on Iran's power projection capabilities.
  • The chairman cited reports that Iran's defense budget accounts for one-third of its $300 billion national budget.
  • The committee discussed the potential for $100 billion in sanctions relief to increase Iran's financial resources.
  • The hearing examined Iran's history of funding and training proxy groups, specifically mentioning Hezbollah.
  • The committee discussed the 1983 Beirut Marine Corps barracks bombing in the context of Iranian-backed activities.

Why It Matters

The hearing assesses the national security implications of the 2015 nuclear deal, specifically focusing on how the potential influx of funds from could alter Iran's military spending and support for regional groups.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
To conduct oversight on how the nuclear deal and potential might affect Iran's military capabilities and its support for in the Middle East.
Who testified at this hearing?
Thomas McInerney, Jonathan Schanzer, Steven Bucci, and Alireza Nader.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Sanctions Relief Impact

The hearing highlights a specific legislative focus on the economic consequences of the nuclear deal as a driver for military expansion.

Connected Entities

personJonathan SchanzerVice President for Research at Foundation for Defense of Democracies and witnessMap →
personRon DeSantisChairman of the Subcommittee on National SecurityMap →
personAlireza NaderSenior International Policy Analyst at Rand Corporation and witnessMap →
personSteven BucciDirector at The Heritage Foundation and witnessMap →
organizationHezbollahLebanese group identified as a recipient of Iranian supportMap →
personThomas McInerneyRetired Lieutenant General and witnessMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment20
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record