POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proposed Changes to 2027 Defense Budget Amendment (SA 6335)

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6335

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Senators Wicker and Reed have proposed an amendment to the 2027 defense authorization bill that adjusts funding levels for various nuclear weapons programs and facility operations. The proposal includes specific reallocations for , production modernization, and community support at the Savannah River Site.

Why it matters

This amendment proposes shifting millions of dollars in authorized spending for Department of Energy defense activities, which directly impacts the budget for nuclear weapons maintenance and facility operations in 2027.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Department of Energy

The agency's authorized funding levels for specific nuclear weapons and facility projects are modified by this amendment.

Directly affected

Savannah River Site

The site's authorized funding for community support and tax payments is adjusted.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the purpose of this amendment?
The amendment proposes specific adjustments to funding levels and project structures within the Department of Energy's defense activities as outlined in the 2027 defense authorization bill.
Does this amendment pass the budget changes immediately?
No, the amendment was submitted and ordered to lie on the table, meaning it is currently a proposal awaiting further legislative action.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Nuclear Infrastructure Funding Adjustment

The amendment reflects a targeted reallocation of funds away from specific project continuations and toward modification programs like W-80-5.

Connected Entities

Savannah River Site, Department of Defense, Department of Energy and 2 more
locationSavannah River Site“Facility receiving adjusted funding for community and regulatory support.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Defense“Agency whose military activities are authorized by the underlying bill.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Energy“Agency whose defense activities are affected by the funding changes.”Map →
PersonMr. Reed“U.S. Senator who co-sponsored the amendment.”Map →
PersonMr. Wicker“U.S. Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record