Hearing on Russia's Strategic Goals in the Middle East and North Africa
January 1, 2017
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
This hearing serves as a formal record of congressional oversight regarding U.S. foreign policy strategy toward Russia's activities in the Middle East, which influences future diplomatic and military decision-making.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs
The committee is responsible for legislative oversight and shaping foreign policy based on the information gathered.
General Public
The public is affected by the resulting foreign policy decisions and national security strategies discussed in the hearing.
Last recorded activity January 1, 2017.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Key Facts
- The hearing took place on June 15, 2017, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
- The subcommittee received testimony from Vladimir Kara-Murza, Anna Borshchevskaya, and Brian Katulis.
- The hearing focused on analyzing Russia's strategic objectives in the Middle East and North Africa region.
- The subcommittee chair and ranking member were allotted 5 minutes each for opening statements.
- Members were granted 5 days to submit additional statements or questions for the record.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the purpose of this hearing?
Who testified at the hearing?
Why It Matters
This hearing serves as a formal record of congressional oversight regarding U.S. foreign policy strategy toward Russia's activities in the Middle East, which influences future diplomatic and military decision-making.
News Coverage
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Historical Context of U.S.-Russia Relations
The hearing highlights long-standing congressional concerns regarding nuclear cooperation agreements with Russia dating back to the Bush administration.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.govinfo.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance60How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools