POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah Governor Signs Family Law Bill Regulating Child Custody Evaluations, Coercive Control Evidence, and Mental Health Treatment

Original title: Family Court Amendments

Last action · March 23, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: Paul Cutler and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Utah enacts HB 303, updating family law proceedings to allow courts to consider evidence of in child custody decisions, establishing qualification standards and a state roster for child custody evaluators, and setting specific procedures for court-ordered mental health treatment. The measure takes effect on May 6, 2026, with certain provisions taking effect upon the governor's approval.

Why it matters

Parents involved in Utah child custody or divorce disputes face new legal standards regarding how courts evaluate domestic safety, mental health professionals, and evidence of . The legislation establishes strict licensing and training mandates for individuals performing s and limits certain court-ordered s.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Parents in Utah Child Custody Proceedings

Litigating parents are subject to new evaluation standards, explicit consideration of coercive control, and modified rules regarding attorney fees, expert evidence, and mental health treatment.

Directly affected

Custody Evaluators and Mental Health Professionals

Mental health professionals conducting child custody evaluations must meet mandatory licensing and 18-hour training requirements and register with the Administrative Office of the Courts.

Directly affected

Minor Children

Children subject to custody and parent-time orders are affected by new standards prioritizing safety, psychological evaluation requirements, and restrictions on certain reunification treatments.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a court consider coercive control in a child custody dispute under this law?
Yes. The law explicitly permits courts to consider evidence of , defined as a pattern of behavior that unreasonably interferes with another individual's independent decision-making, when deciding child custody or .
What qualifications must a custody evaluator have?
A custody evaluator must hold a valid professional license from the Division of Professional Licensing (as a clinical social worker, psychologist, psychiatrist, marriage and family therapist, or clinical mental health counselor) and complete at least 18 hours of specialized education or training regarding child development, family dynamics, and the effects of domestic violence and abuse.
Are a custody evaluator's recommendations binding on the court?
No. A custody evaluator's findings in making a custody or decision are advisory only, and there is no legal presumption in favor of their findings.
Does the law discriminate against parents who use medical cannabis?
No. The law explicitly prohibits courts from treating a parent's lawful possession or use of medicinal cannabis or status as a medical cannabis cardholder or agent any differently than any other prescribed controlled substance.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

58 actions
  1. Mar 23, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 12, 2026House
    House/ to Governor
  3. Mar 12, 2026House
    House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Mar 11, 2026House
    House/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Mar 11, 2026Clerk of the House
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Mar 6, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 52 earlier actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from House for Enrolling
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
  3. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  4. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  5. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
  6. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  7. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  8. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ concurs with Senate amendment
  9. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ placed on Concurrence Calendar
  10. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  11. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House with amendments
  12. Mar 5, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
  13. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ substituted
  14. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
  15. Mar 5, 2026Senate
    Senate/ Rules to 2nd Reading Calendar
  16. Mar 5, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0303S03
  17. Mar 4, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd Reading Calendar to Rules
  18. Mar 4, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0303S03
  19. Mar 4, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0303S03
  20. Mar 4, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0303S03
  21. Feb 26, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0303S02
  22. Feb 26, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0303S02
  23. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  24. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ comm rpt/ substituted
  25. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  26. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  27. Feb 25, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0303S02
  28. Feb 25, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0303S02
  29. Feb 23, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  30. Feb 20, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  31. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  32. Feb 19, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  33. Feb 19, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  34. Feb 19, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  35. Feb 12, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0303S01
  36. Feb 12, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0303S01
  37. Feb 12, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  38. Feb 12, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ substituted
  39. Feb 11, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  40. Feb 11, 2026House
    House Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  41. Feb 11, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0303S01
  42. Feb 11, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0303S01
  43. Feb 9, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  44. Jan 27, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  45. Jan 26, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0303
  46. Jan 26, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0303
  47. Jan 21, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  48. Jan 21, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  49. Jan 21, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0303
  50. Jan 21, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0303
  51. Jan 21, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  52. Jan 21, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Formalization of Custody Evaluator Roster

The legislation shifts custody evaluation oversight by requiring the Administrative Office of the Courts to maintain a formal public roster with strict licensing and training prerequisites.

Connected Entities

Division of Professional Licensing, Michael K. McKell, Administrative Office of the Courts and 1 more
OrganizationDivision of Professional Licensing“Licenses mental health professionals and custody evaluators”Map →
PersonMichael K. McKell“Senate Sponsor of HB 303”Map →
OrganizationAdministrative Office of the Courts“Maintains the roster of custody evaluators and manages compliance”Map →
PersonPaul A. Cutler“Chief Sponsor of HB 303 in the lower house”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record