POLISCOPE
Back to feed
Part ofEPA
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on EPA's Proposed Ozone Rule

Original title: EPA'S PROPOSED OZONE RULE

January 1, 2015

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

The hearing addressed potential changes to federal s, which dictate air quality compliance requirements for states and local jurisdictions, impacting industrial operations and public health policy.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Environmental Protection Agency

The agency is responsible for drafting and implementing the proposed ozone standards.

Local governments and planning organizations

Entities like the Cabarrus-Rowan Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization submitted resolutions regarding the potential impact of the rule on their regions.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2015.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

This document is a transcript record of a 2015 House Subcommittee hearing regarding the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed changes to national ozone air quality standards. The hearing featured testimony from EPA officials and included various submitted statements from local government and industry organizations.

Key Facts

  • The hearing took place on June 12, 2015, in the Rayburn House Office Building.
  • The subject was the EPA's proposed ozone rule, which sets national air quality standards.
  • Janet McCabe, Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation at the EPA, provided testimony.
  • The committee received submitted materials from the Cabarrus Regional Chamber of Commerce, Rowan County Board of Commissioners, and the Cabarrus-Rowan Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.
  • The committee received a statement from the National Association of Clean Air Agencies.
  • The committee received survey results from the Association of Air Pollution Control Agencies.
  • The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality submitted formal comments regarding the proposed rule.
  • A scientific article titled 'Challenges of a lowered U.S. ozone standard' was entered into the record.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was held to review and discuss the EPA's proposed changes to national ozone air quality standards.
Who testified at the hearing?
Janet McCabe, the Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation at the EPA, was the primary witness.

Why It Matters

The hearing addressed potential changes to federal s, which dictate air quality compliance requirements for states and local jurisdictions, impacting industrial operations and public health policy.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Regional Opposition

Local government and planning organizations from North Carolina submitted formal resolutions regarding the EPA's proposal, indicating significant regional interest in the rule's implementation.

Connected Entities

personEd WhitfieldChairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and Power.Map →
personFrank Pallone, Jr.Ranking Member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce.Map →
organizationSubcommittee on Energy and PowerThe congressional body that held the hearing.Map →
organizationEnvironmental Protection AgencyThe federal agency proposing the ozone rule changes.Map →
personJanet McCabeActing Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation at the EPA, served as a witMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record