POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofHealth →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Bill Protects Gun Ownership Rights for Medical Cannabis Patients and Caregivers

Original title: Pertaining to the right of lawful medical cannabis card holders, and their caregivers

Last action · January 14, 2026: To House JudiciarySponsor: Chuck Horst

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

House Bill 4150 explicitly allows lawful medical cannabis card holders and their s to own, purchase, and possess firearms and ammunition in West Virginia. Under the measure, state and local agencies are prohibited from restricting firearm rights based solely on an individual's status as a medical cannabis patient or caregiver.

Why it matters

The measure establishes a statutory protection ensuring that medical marijuana patients do not forfeit their second amendment rights due to their participation in the state's cannabis program.

Background
  • West Virginia legalized medical cannabis through legislation enacted in recent years, creating a registered cardholder system. context
  • Federal law under 18 U.S.C. § 922 generally prohibits unlawful users of controlled substances from possessing firearms, creating a legal conflict for medical cannabis patients in many states. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

medical cannabis card holders

Medical cannabis card holders gain explicit statutory protection allowing them to own, purchase, and possess firearms and ammunition.

Directly affected

caregivers

Caregivers for medical cannabis patients are granted the same protections to own, purchase, and possess firearms and ammunition.

Directly affected

state and local agencies

State and local agencies are prohibited from restricting, revoking, or suspending firearm rights or licenses based solely on medical cannabis status.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can state or local agencies take away a firearm license from a medical cannabis card holder?
No state or local agency, municipal, or county governing authority shall restrict, revoke, suspend, or otherwise infringe upon the right of a person to own, purchase, or possess a firearm or related certification based solely on their status as a medical cannabis card holder or .
Are all medical cannabis card holders automatically guaranteed the right to own a firearm?
The protection does not apply if the current or aftereffects of consuming medical cannabis affects mental, emotional, or physical processes to a degree that would result in abnormal behavior.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Jan 14, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Judiciary
  2. Jan 14, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House
  3. Jan 14, 2026HouseCommittee
    To Judiciary
  4. Jan 14, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

West Virginia Legislature
OrganizationWest Virginia Legislature“Legislative body considering the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record