POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas House Bill 1221 raises the maximum pretrial intervention reimbursement fee to $1,200

Original title: Relating to increasing the reimbursement fee for certain expenses related to pretrial intervention programs.

Last action · April 25, 2025: Committee report sent to CalendarsSponsor: J.M. Lozano

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

Relating to increasing the reimbursement fee for certain expenses related to pretrial intervention programs.

Why it matters

Participants in county s face a maximum potential cost increase of $700 for expenses incurred by prosecutors and counties. The change applies strictly to offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025, leaving prior offenses governed by the previous $500 limit.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

defendants participating in pretrial intervention programs

Participants may face higher maximum reimbursement fee charges up to $1,200 for offenses committed on or after September 1, 2025.

Directly affected

district attorneys, criminal district attorneys, and county attorneys

Prosecutors are authorized to collect an increased reimbursement fee amount to cover office and county expenses.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

12 actions
  1. Apr 25, 2025House
    Committee report sent to Calendars
  2. Apr 24, 2025House
    Committee report distributed
  3. Apr 24, 2025House
    Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  4. Apr 16, 2025HouseCommittee
    Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  5. Apr 16, 2025House
    Considered in formal meeting
  6. Apr 8, 2025House
    Left pending in committee
Show 6 earlier actions
  1. Apr 8, 2025House
    Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  2. Apr 8, 2025House
    Considered in public hearing
  3. Apr 8, 2025House
    Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  4. Mar 10, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
  5. Mar 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  6. Nov 12, 2024HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

J.M. Lozano
PersonJ.M. Lozano“Bill author in the lower house”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record