POLISCOPE
Back to feed
FEDERALhearing transcript

Congressional Hearing on Clean Energy in the Building Sector

Original title: BUILDING A 100 PERCENT CLEAN ECONOMY: SOLUTIONS FOR THE U.S. BUILDING SECTOR

January 1, 2021

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This hearing explored legislative pathways to improve building energy efficiency, which could eventually lead to new federal standards or incentives affecting construction costs, utility bills, and building design requirements for residents and businesses.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Homeowners and Renters

Future building efficiency standards discussed in this hearing could influence utility costs and construction requirements for residential properties.

Construction and Building Industry

Changes to energy codes or building standards discussed by the committee would impact building materials, design practices, and compliance costs for builders.

What changed

Last recorded activity January 1, 2021.

What's next

Next step not available in the current record.

Summary

The House Subcommittee on Energy held a hearing on September 20, 2019, to discuss strategies for reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions in U.S. buildings. Industry experts, architects, and labor representatives provided testimony on potential policy solutions for a cleaner building economy.

Key Facts

  • The hearing was held on September 20, 2019, by the Subcommittee on Energy of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  • The primary objective was to discuss solutions for achieving a 100 percent clean economy specifically within the U.S. building sector.
  • Witnesses included representatives from the American Institute of Architects, the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, BASF Corporation, the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers, the National Association of Home Builders, and the U.S. Green Building Council.
  • The record includes submitted materials from Microsoft, AnnDyl Policy Group, Sunstreet Energy Group, and the American Public Gas Association.
  • The hearing is documented as Serial No. 116-64 of the 116th Congress.

Why It Matters

This hearing explored legislative pathways to improve building energy efficiency, which could eventually lead to new federal standards or incentives affecting construction costs, utility bills, and building design requirements for residents and businesses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the purpose of this hearing?
The hearing was convened to gather expert testimony on how to make the U.S. building sector more energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable.
Did this hearing result in a new law?
No, this was a legislative hearing to gather information and expert opinions; it did not result in the passage of a law.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Sponsors

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Focus on Building Sector Decarbonization

The hearing highlights a specific legislative focus on the building sector as a primary target for achieving broader national clean energy goals.

Connected Entities

organizationU.S. Green Building CouncilRepresented by witness Elizabeth R. BeardsleyMap →
organizationAmerican Institute of ArchitectsRepresented by witness Carl ElefanteMap →
organizationAmerican Council for an Energy-Efficient EconomyRepresented by witness Steven NadelMap →
organizationNational Association of Home BuildersRepresented by witness Arn McIntyreMap →
personFred UptonRanking Member of the Subcommittee on EnergyMap →
organizationBASF CorporationRepresented by witness Curtis J. ZimmermannMap →
personBobby L. RushChairman of the Subcommittee on EnergyMap →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record