POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

South Dakota Legislature urges congressional delegation to hold annual joint meetings

Original title: encouraging the state's congressional delegation to meet with the Legislature.

Last action · February 11, 2026: Deferred to the 41st legislative daySponsors: Phil Jensen and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

South Dakota lawmakers approved a non-binding resolution encouraging the state's members of Congress to meet annually with the Legislature for at least one hour as a .

Why it matters

Establishes an official legislative invitation for federal lawmakers to discuss federal actions and state impacts, though the meetings depend entirely on scheduling agreements with congressional members.

Background
  • House Concurrent Resolutions are non-binding expressions of sentiment adopted by both chambers of a state legislature and do not require the governor's signature. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

South Dakota state legislators

State lawmakers are invited to participate in an annual joint committee of the whole with federal representatives.

Directly affected

South Dakota congressional delegation

Federal representatives are encouraged to attend an annual meeting with the state Legislature.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this resolution require members of Congress to attend?
No. The resolution only encourages congressional members to meet with the Legislature at an agreed-upon time.
How long are the requested meetings supposed to last?
At least one hour.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This resolution did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 11, 2026House
    Deferred to the 41st legislative day
  2. Feb 11, 2026House
    Scheduled for hearing
  3. Feb 6, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to
  4. Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First Reading House

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

South Dakota, United States, South Dakota Legislature and 1 more
locationSouth Dakota“State whose legislature and congressional delegation are addressed”Map →
locationUnited States“Reference to the United States Constitution and federal government”Map →
OrganizationSouth Dakota Legislature“State legislative body passing the concurrent resolution”Map →
PersonPhil Jensen“Representative introducing House Concurrent Resolution 6013”Map →

Sources

Open source document

sdlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 20)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record