The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Proposed Closure of a Portion of Coconut Drive
Record date · April 7, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The City Commission is considering an ordinance to vacate, or permanently close, a 50-foot by 102-foot section of Coconut Drive. This request is filed under Case No. UDP-V21002 by David Ide.
The ordinance would remove a specific portion of public right-of-way from city control, which changes land access and ownership rights for the area in Commission District 4.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
David Ide
As the applicant, he is seeking the legal vacation of the specified public land.
Residents of Commission District 4
They are the local stakeholders whose neighborhood infrastructure and public access routes may be altered by the closure.
Key Facts
- The ordinance proposes the vacation of a 50-foot-wide by 102-foot-long portion of Coconut Drive.
- The application is filed under Case No. UDP-V21002.
- The proposal is located within Commission District 4.
- The process is classified as 'Quasi-Judicial,' requiring speakers to be sworn in.
Show all 8 facts
- The Commission is required to disclose any site visits, communications, or expert opinions as part of the official record.
- The ordinance is currently at the 'First Reading' stage.
- The file number for this legislative item is 26-0238.
- The Development Services department is the body responsible for the filing.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does 'vacation of right-of-way' mean?
Why do I have to be sworn in to speak?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceFull breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Quasi-Judicial Requirement
The document explicitly mandates that all speakers be sworn in, highlighting the legal formality of this specific land-use request.
Sources
webapi.legistar.com
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance30How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
