POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofTaxes →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

New Orleans Authorized to Levy Up to 2% Sales and Hotel Taxes in Faubourg Marigny District Pending Voter Approval

Original title: DISTRICTS/CRIME PREVENT: Provides relative to the Faubourg Marigny Security and Improvement District in Orleans Parish

Last action · April 1, 2026: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Municipal, Parochial and Cultural Affairs.Sponsor: Candace Newell

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

New Orleans city officials are authorized to levy a sales tax and a hotel occupancy tax of up to 2% within the Faubourg Marigny Security and Improvement District, provided voters approve the taxes in a local election. The measures are set to take effect on July 1, 2026, if enacted.

Why it matters

Residents, shoppers, and hotel guests within the Faubourg Marigny district face potential new local taxes of up to 2% on retail sales, digital products, services, and hotel room rentals, pending a local referendum.

Background
  • The Faubourg Marigny Security and Improvement District is an existing political subdivision in Orleans Parish established to promote neighborhood security and quality of life initiatives. context
  • House Bill 483 was introduced during the 2026 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature by Representative Candace N. Newell. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Faubourg Marigny Security and Improvement District residents

District residents are subject to potential new local sales taxes and voter referendums regarding district funding.

Directly affected

Hotel operators and guests in the district

Individuals renting hotel rooms within the district must pay a hotel occupancy tax of up to 2% if approved by voters.

Directly affected

City of New Orleans

The governing authority is granted the power to levy, collect, and contract administration for the new sales and hotel occupancy taxes.

Key Facts

  • The governing authority of the city of New Orleans is authorized to levy and collect a sales and use tax within the Faubourg Marigny Security and Improvement District not to exceed two percent.
  • The sales tax applies to retail sales, leases, rentals, consumption, distribution, storage of tangible personal property or digital products, and services within the district boundaries.
  • Imposition of the sales tax requires approval by a majority of qualified electors of the district voting on the proposition at an election.
  • The city of New Orleans is authorized to levy a hotel occupancy tax not to exceed two percent of the rent or fee charged for hotel rooms located within the district.
Show all 9 facts
  • The hotel occupancy tax must be paid by the person who exercises or is entitled to occupancy of the hotel room when the fee is paid.
  • The hotel occupancy tax requires approval by a majority of electors of the district voting at an election.
  • The governing authority may contract with any public entity authorized to collect sales or use taxes for the collection of the hotel occupancy tax.
  • The district is authorized to solicit and accept additional voluntary contributions and grants.
  • The Act becomes effective on July 1, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

What taxes does House Bill 483 authorize for the Faubourg Marigny district?
The bill authorizes the city of New Orleans to levy a sales and use tax of up to 2% and a hotel occupancy tax of up to 2% within the Faubourg Marigny Security and Improvement District.
Do the proposed taxes require voter approval?
Yes. Both the sales tax and the hotel occupancy tax must be approved by a majority of the of the district voting in an election held for that purpose.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Apr 1, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Municipal, Parochial and Cultural Affairs.
  2. Mar 31, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title. Lies over under the rules.
  3. Feb 27, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.
  4. Feb 26, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled. To be introduced at a later date.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of District Funding Mechanisms

The bill expands the funding tools available to the Faubourg Marigny Security and Improvement District from parcel fees and voluntary contributions to include local sales and hotel occupancy taxes.

Connected Entities

New Orleans, Faubourg Marigny Security and Improvement District, Candace Newell and 1 more
locationNew Orleans“City governing authority authorized to levy the taxes”Map →
OrganizationFaubourg Marigny Security and Improvement District“Special security and improvement district located in Orleans Parish”Map →
PersonCandace Newell“State Representative sponsoring House Bill No. 483”Map →
locationOrleans Parish“Parish where the security district is established”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record