POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas House Bill 1611 qualifies juvenile correctional officers and caseworkers for custodial officer retirement status

Original title: Relating to eligibility for custodial officer service in the Employees Retirement System of Texas by certain juvenile correctional officers and caseworkers employed by the Texas Juvenile Justice Department.

Last action · March 12, 2025: Referred to Pensions, Investments & Financial ServicesSponsors: John Lujan and 1 other

Companion · SB 1115same policy, Senate version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Texas House Bill 1611 classifies certain juvenile correctional officers and caseworkers employed by the Texas Juvenile Justice Department as s within the Employees Retirement System of Texas, beginning September 1, 2025. This change allows eligible employees to establish custodial officer and participate in supplemental retirement benefits, provided they do not retire before September 1, 2027.

Why it matters

Changes retirement benefit calculations and contribution requirements for juvenile correctional officers and caseworkers in Texas, impacting their eligibility for supplemental retirement funds managed by the state.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

juvenile correctional officers employed by the Texas Juvenile Justice Department

Their retirement service classification changes to custodial officer status, altering their eligibility for supplemental retirement benefits and contribution deductions.

Directly affected

caseworkers employed by the Texas Juvenile Justice Department

They become eligible for custodial officer service credit and related supplemental retirement fund provisions.

Directly affected

Employees Retirement System of Texas

The system must process new certifications, adjust service credit determinations, and manage supplemental retirement fund contributions and benefits for the newly included personnel.

Directly affected

Texas Juvenile Justice Department

The department must consult on implementation rules, certify employee names and prior service amounts, and begin making payroll deductions for the supplemental retirement fund.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who becomes eligible for custodial officer service credit under this bill?
Juvenile correctional officers and caseworkers employed by the Texas Juvenile Justice Department are newly included as s in the Employees Retirement System of Texas.
Can past service earned before the effective date count toward custodial officer benefits?
Yes, prior service earned as a juvenile correctional officer or caseworker before the effective date can be considered for supplemental retirement benefits, provided the member does not retire before September 1, 2027.
Who determines a person's eligibility to receive credit as a custodial officer?
The applicable agency—such as the Texas Juvenile Justice Department or the Texas Department of Criminal Justice—determines eligibility, though determinations are subject to change by the retirement system and cannot be appealed by the employee.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Mar 12, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Pensions, Investments & Financial Services
  2. Mar 12, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. Dec 13, 2024HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Custodial Officer Retirement Class

The bill broadens the traditional definition of custodial officers—historically tied mostly to adult correctional and parole personnel—to encompass specific juvenile justice personnel.

Connected Entities

Board of Pardons and Paroles, Public Safety Commission, Texas Juvenile Justice Department and 8 more
OrganizationBoard of Pardons and Paroles“State board employing parole officers and caseworkers”Map →
OrganizationPublic Safety Commission“Commission responsible for certifying law enforcement and custodial officers”Map →
OrganizationTexas Juvenile Justice Department“State agency employing affected juvenile correctional officers and caseworkers”Map →
PersonJohn Lujan“Bill author in the lower house”Map →
OrganizationTexas Department of Criminal Justice“State agency employing correctional and parole personnel”Map →
OrganizationEmployees Retirement System of Texas“State retirement system affected by the bill”Map →
OrganizationParks and Wildlife Commission“Commission responsible for certifying officers”Map →
OrganizationThe University of Texas Medical Branch“Managed health care unit operating in connection with correctional transfers”Map →
OrganizationTexas Alcoholic Beverage Commission“Commission responsible for certifying officers”Map →
OrganizationTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center“Managed health care unit operating in connection with correctional transfers”Map →
PersonDavid Cook“Bill author”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record