POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Proposed Land Use Change for 3.72 Acres in Port St. Lucie (Failed)

Original title: Ordinance 25-17, Public Hearing, an Ordinance Amending the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Port St. Lucie to Include a Small-Scale Amendment to the Future Land Use Designation for Approximately 3.72 Acres from Limited Commercial (CL) to Low Density Residential (RL) for a Parcel Legally Described as Port St. Lucie Section 47 Tract E (P25-010)

Record date · June 9, 2025

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

The Port St. Lucie City Council considered an ordinance to change the land use designation for a 3.72-acre parcel from Limited Commercial to Low Density Residential. The proposal, identified as P25-010, did not pass.

Why it matters

The failure of this ordinance means the 3.72-acre parcel located at Port St. Lucie Section 47 Tract E will retain its current land use designation rather than being converted to .

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Property owners of Port St. Lucie Section 47 Tract E

The land use designation for their property remains Limited Commercial (CL) following the failure of the ordinance.

Directly affected

Port St. Lucie City Council

The body responsible for reviewing and voting on the proposed land use amendment.

Key Facts

  • Ordinance 25-17 was officially recorded as 'Failed'.
  • The ordinance proposed changing the land use designation for approximately 3.72 acres of land.
  • The proposed change was from Limited Commercial (CL) to Low Density Residential (RL).
  • The affected parcel is legally described as Port St. Lucie Section 47 Tract E.
Show all 6 facts
  • The ordinance was introduced on April 3, 2025.
  • The proposal was processed under file number 2025-369.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does it mean that the ordinance 'failed'?
It means the proposed change to the land use designation was not approved by the City Council, and the property's status remains unchanged.
What was the intended change for the property?
The ordinance sought to rezone 3.72 acres from to .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Failed.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Failed Land Use Amendment

The city attempted to shift a parcel from commercial to residential use, but the measure failed to pass.

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance30
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record